08-06-2024, 08:36 AM
Dear Aga Tentakulus,
The structure found in one (in VM & in Turkish) does not exist in the other (in IE languages) in the same structural pattern.
If a comparison is to be made between two examples, and we want this comparison to be scientific, we must first avoid comparing apples to bicycles. It would even be beneficial to make sure we are not comparing apples to oranges.
I would like to ask which Indo-European language contains a word triad as in the example you provided, but before that, you will need to prove that the example you gave is indeed a word triad. Let's assume you have done this. Then, in addition, you will need to show that quadruplets and quintuplets of repetitions are also found in the same form in the same language. As I said, our goal is to see if we can find equal examples for comparison. I have indicated another Turkish manuscript where all these features are seen together (just as they can be together in a manuscript in the structure of VM texts), referring to Turkish manuscripts.
I found this name in the articles of linguists, but the scanned images of the original pages of the mentioned manuscript are not available on the internet. I cannot also distinguish similar words due to my inability to read because the Arabic alphabet is used. If I could read the Arabic alphabet, I would have had to find the original manuscript referred to, but as I said, this detail is a matter written in some academic articles by some linguists about some Turkish manuscripts, and I have given references to these sources.
Furthermore, we encounter such structures throughout all periods of Turkish history. We can see word repetition structures in Old Turkish texts on almost everyone or a few pages of my writing. In a language that writes words twice to some extent to make plurals, we should not be surprised by the frequency of these structures.
However, when we look for examples to make a statistical comparison, we cannot do so because we cannot find the word quadruplets and quintuplets in IE languages. At the same time, this search effort itself carries statistical value. Because we are already comparing a writing form that is in Turkish but not found (unencountered) in the Indo-European language group, and here we have a zero value on one side and a value of 1 and more on the comparison table on the other side.
I write again that if science is to make a statistical comparison or comparative linguistics studies between two examples, it looks at whether these examples are found in the same or similar form. The examples you created in your mind or said to exist in spoken language, and the example you gave here (which I will assume is an exception and a triad), cannot be compared with the VM and Turkish overlaps. The structure found in one does not exist in the other in the same structural pattern.
Thanks
The structure found in one (in VM & in Turkish) does not exist in the other (in IE languages) in the same structural pattern.
If a comparison is to be made between two examples, and we want this comparison to be scientific, we must first avoid comparing apples to bicycles. It would even be beneficial to make sure we are not comparing apples to oranges.
I would like to ask which Indo-European language contains a word triad as in the example you provided, but before that, you will need to prove that the example you gave is indeed a word triad. Let's assume you have done this. Then, in addition, you will need to show that quadruplets and quintuplets of repetitions are also found in the same form in the same language. As I said, our goal is to see if we can find equal examples for comparison. I have indicated another Turkish manuscript where all these features are seen together (just as they can be together in a manuscript in the structure of VM texts), referring to Turkish manuscripts.
I found this name in the articles of linguists, but the scanned images of the original pages of the mentioned manuscript are not available on the internet. I cannot also distinguish similar words due to my inability to read because the Arabic alphabet is used. If I could read the Arabic alphabet, I would have had to find the original manuscript referred to, but as I said, this detail is a matter written in some academic articles by some linguists about some Turkish manuscripts, and I have given references to these sources.
Furthermore, we encounter such structures throughout all periods of Turkish history. We can see word repetition structures in Old Turkish texts on almost everyone or a few pages of my writing. In a language that writes words twice to some extent to make plurals, we should not be surprised by the frequency of these structures.
However, when we look for examples to make a statistical comparison, we cannot do so because we cannot find the word quadruplets and quintuplets in IE languages. At the same time, this search effort itself carries statistical value. Because we are already comparing a writing form that is in Turkish but not found (unencountered) in the Indo-European language group, and here we have a zero value on one side and a value of 1 and more on the comparison table on the other side.
I write again that if science is to make a statistical comparison or comparative linguistics studies between two examples, it looks at whether these examples are found in the same or similar form. The examples you created in your mind or said to exist in spoken language, and the example you gave here (which I will assume is an exception and a triad), cannot be compared with the VM and Turkish overlaps. The structure found in one does not exist in the other in the same structural pattern.
Thanks