07-06-2024, 10:11 PM
Dear Koen,
In fact, there has been a discourtesy towards me for a long time. My simple questions have not been answered, and of course, you are not obligated to answer them. However, at the same time, the evidence and ideas that I write about some VM study points are often distorted and presented as though I wrote things that I did not. For this reason, I invite everyone who enters my page and reads what I write to be fair and respectful towards me. Anyone who would distort what I have written here or the subject should not engage in dialogue with me under this heading, because they will create a situation that is a complete waste of time. My time is valuable and I invite everyone to respect it. Nonsense comments or articles that will waste my time are completely unnecessary here. The topic is VM and what I wrote is about pieces of evidence.
On this page, I write that scientific evidence sweeps away some possibilities. Artificial intelligence does its job incompletely but well. I do not want to enter into a mutual dialogue with people here, one by one, because this is not my purpose. However, not being able to get answers to the questions I ask in VM details, and not being able to get criticism, support, or contribution within the framework of linguistics is quite tiring. We don't need to be exhausted with each other.
Do you know why the machine understands the very clear evidence about the Voynich content? Because machines do not have prejudices, stereotypes, nationalism, and racism. They analyze the data they have. The result we declared is very clear and obvious. I presented two basic and linguistically clear/concrete proofs along with their documents and similar examples. This evidence eliminated the possibility that the VM texts were in Indo-European and Semitic languages. You should be happy about this situation. Because we have narrowed down and demonstrated the area that needs to be looked at with these findings.
In fact, there has been a discourtesy towards me for a long time. My simple questions have not been answered, and of course, you are not obligated to answer them. However, at the same time, the evidence and ideas that I write about some VM study points are often distorted and presented as though I wrote things that I did not. For this reason, I invite everyone who enters my page and reads what I write to be fair and respectful towards me. Anyone who would distort what I have written here or the subject should not engage in dialogue with me under this heading, because they will create a situation that is a complete waste of time. My time is valuable and I invite everyone to respect it. Nonsense comments or articles that will waste my time are completely unnecessary here. The topic is VM and what I wrote is about pieces of evidence.
On this page, I write that scientific evidence sweeps away some possibilities. Artificial intelligence does its job incompletely but well. I do not want to enter into a mutual dialogue with people here, one by one, because this is not my purpose. However, not being able to get answers to the questions I ask in VM details, and not being able to get criticism, support, or contribution within the framework of linguistics is quite tiring. We don't need to be exhausted with each other.
Do you know why the machine understands the very clear evidence about the Voynich content? Because machines do not have prejudices, stereotypes, nationalism, and racism. They analyze the data they have. The result we declared is very clear and obvious. I presented two basic and linguistically clear/concrete proofs along with their documents and similar examples. This evidence eliminated the possibility that the VM texts were in Indo-European and Semitic languages. You should be happy about this situation. Because we have narrowed down and demonstrated the area that needs to be looked at with these findings.