07-06-2024, 02:04 PM
(This post was last modified: 07-06-2024, 02:08 PM by Ahmet Ardıç.)
There are actually funny aspects to the job and it is very entertaining to watch it.
For example:
1- We have shown that repeated words written side by side can extend to triplet, quadruplet, and quintuplet structures in Turkish, and that this phenomenon is present in the VM texts as well (by referring to Turkish manuscripts outside of VM).
2- We have proven with evidence that words in Turkish never start with certain sounds/syllables and never end with certain syllables. We have shown that the same applies to VM texts for the same syllables/sounds.
* We explained that the two findings above are structural matches in the languages being compared, and we wrote that these features, being identical, are not found in any other known language in the world.
This means that these findings are unique to the Turkish language. So, These are Turkish-specific overlaps only.
You should have understood the existence of these findings just by looking at the photographic/draw-structural patterns of the texts' word structures, even without knowing which language the texts are in (and without needing to know Turkish).
Even children with average intelligence understand this. I assume and know that people among you who have any remote connection to science also understand this.
When artificial intelligence sees such a Turkish-specific finding, what do you expect it to say to explain it?
What scientific conclusions can you draw from these findings, and what conclusions can you never draw?
As you can understand, due to the existence of these two structural findings, all options other than Turkish are completely invalid in terms of being candidates for VM texts.
Can you understand this?
In other words, candidates other than Turkish became completely garbage as soon as these two findings were revealed. For example, All Indo-European and all Semitic languages lost their candidacy. The only thing that can change this situation is if a scientist comes forward and clearly proves that the same two structural overlaps exist in old IE manuscripts and language features of, for example, Indo-European languages. But I am sure that there will not be a single person who can prove this in the future because a similar situation has never been recorded in the same form in the ancient writing history of languages other than Turkish.
Can you understand this kind of reality?
Ofcourse, you can continue to spend time under speculative and useless titles such as "No text, but a visual code," "Can VM be written in vowelless Latin," and "initial characters, to be last? right-to-left handwriting" as you have done for many years. However, those who do not understand the scientific significance of the findings I mentioned above should stop writing comments to me because you are completely wasting my time. I do not possess the information to make you smarter. The evidence is clear, those who understand have understood, and those who do not understand will not understand, I suppose.
For example:
1- We have shown that repeated words written side by side can extend to triplet, quadruplet, and quintuplet structures in Turkish, and that this phenomenon is present in the VM texts as well (by referring to Turkish manuscripts outside of VM).
2- We have proven with evidence that words in Turkish never start with certain sounds/syllables and never end with certain syllables. We have shown that the same applies to VM texts for the same syllables/sounds.
* We explained that the two findings above are structural matches in the languages being compared, and we wrote that these features, being identical, are not found in any other known language in the world.
This means that these findings are unique to the Turkish language. So, These are Turkish-specific overlaps only.
You should have understood the existence of these findings just by looking at the photographic/draw-structural patterns of the texts' word structures, even without knowing which language the texts are in (and without needing to know Turkish).
Even children with average intelligence understand this. I assume and know that people among you who have any remote connection to science also understand this.
When artificial intelligence sees such a Turkish-specific finding, what do you expect it to say to explain it?
What scientific conclusions can you draw from these findings, and what conclusions can you never draw?
As you can understand, due to the existence of these two structural findings, all options other than Turkish are completely invalid in terms of being candidates for VM texts.
Can you understand this?
In other words, candidates other than Turkish became completely garbage as soon as these two findings were revealed. For example, All Indo-European and all Semitic languages lost their candidacy. The only thing that can change this situation is if a scientist comes forward and clearly proves that the same two structural overlaps exist in old IE manuscripts and language features of, for example, Indo-European languages. But I am sure that there will not be a single person who can prove this in the future because a similar situation has never been recorded in the same form in the ancient writing history of languages other than Turkish.
Can you understand this kind of reality?
Ofcourse, you can continue to spend time under speculative and useless titles such as "No text, but a visual code," "Can VM be written in vowelless Latin," and "initial characters, to be last? right-to-left handwriting" as you have done for many years. However, those who do not understand the scientific significance of the findings I mentioned above should stop writing comments to me because you are completely wasting my time. I do not possess the information to make you smarter. The evidence is clear, those who understand have understood, and those who do not understand will not understand, I suppose.