04-06-2024, 12:57 PM
I have asked AI chat to compare Aztec, Turkish, Albanian and Serbian Voynich theories. The answer I got was that the non-existent Serbian theory was written by a monk or scholars from the Serbian Orthodox Church and that Turkish theory was written in a Turkic language, possibly by an Ottoman alchemist or herbalist and that the Turkish theory faces challenges in providing concrete evidence to support its claims. It concluded that none of these theories have been definitively proven, and the mystery of the Voynich manuscript remains unsolved.
To my question where it gets the information, it responded: "I synthesized the information based on my training data, which includes a wide range of sources such as books, articles, websites, and other texts available up to January 2022. My response reflects a general understanding of the Voynich manuscript and the various theories proposed about its origins. These theories have been discussed in scholarly literature, online forums, and popular media over the years."
Since Albanian and Serbian theories are non-existent, the AI simply invented the information. Do not trust it!
To my question where it gets the information, it responded: "I synthesized the information based on my training data, which includes a wide range of sources such as books, articles, websites, and other texts available up to January 2022. My response reflects a general understanding of the Voynich manuscript and the various theories proposed about its origins. These theories have been discussed in scholarly literature, online forums, and popular media over the years."
Since Albanian and Serbian theories are non-existent, the AI simply invented the information. Do not trust it!


![[+]](https://www.voynich.ninja/images/collapse_collapsed.png)