16-04-2024, 04:24 PM
Dear friends, dear researchers,
I had mentioned some structural similarities between VM texts and Turkish texts through comparison. For instance, in Turkish, words do not only begin with certain sounds/letters but also do not end with some sounds/letters. I had listed these here because there is a complete overlap in these sounds/letters among the compared texts. This is a specific case unique to Turkish.
For example, besides word repetitions in pairs, triplets, quadruplets, and quintuplets, which are unique to Turkish, I had also provided examples from historical manuscripts and references to academic articles on this matter. (Some might remember.)
For instance, it is known that in the manuscript "Kutadgu Bilig" written by Yusuf Has Hacib in the 11th century, there are examples of word repetitions in pairs, triplets, quadruplets, and quintuplets. Such instances are encountered in all known periods of written Turkish.
Now, these are clear structural overlaps that are exclusively and solely peculiar to Turkish. They have not been observed in other languages in the same way. There is not a single record of anything similar in languages other than Turkish throughout history.
So what does this mean? How should we interpret this? I had asked these questions, and you did not answer them either. If all these, along with more than 1000 words, 112 drawing-word matches and hundreds of complete sentence readings and some full-page readings, are not sufficient for you to realize that Turkish is present in the content, then I don't know what else to say to you.
Is there any researcher who can show similar repetitions of words (such as quadruplets or quintuplets) in any other language's manuscript?
You cannot do this in any language other than Turkish.
Yes,
Please, I am waiting for your comments on all the overlaps.
It is my hope and belief that Ms. Lisa Fagin Davis may recognized long ago that our assertion regarding the potential presence of Turkish in the content stands as the most compelling possibility. However, I speculate that she may be awaiting interpretation from Turkish language specialists and linguists. Or she may not have had the free time to read our latest articles/posts or follow the developments of our work because she may too busy with her work.
I am also grateful to dear Lisa Fagin Davis for taking the time to review our first paper/work and giving us many valuable advice on how to write an academic article in the most accurate way. I would like to thank her again, here in front of you all. As a family team members, we are lucky to have the chance to benefit from her intelligence and experience.
It's worth noting that many Turkish language experts already extend their congratulations upon successfully interpreting these my paper. You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.
Best regards,
I had mentioned some structural similarities between VM texts and Turkish texts through comparison. For instance, in Turkish, words do not only begin with certain sounds/letters but also do not end with some sounds/letters. I had listed these here because there is a complete overlap in these sounds/letters among the compared texts. This is a specific case unique to Turkish.
For example, besides word repetitions in pairs, triplets, quadruplets, and quintuplets, which are unique to Turkish, I had also provided examples from historical manuscripts and references to academic articles on this matter. (Some might remember.)
For instance, it is known that in the manuscript "Kutadgu Bilig" written by Yusuf Has Hacib in the 11th century, there are examples of word repetitions in pairs, triplets, quadruplets, and quintuplets. Such instances are encountered in all known periods of written Turkish.
Now, these are clear structural overlaps that are exclusively and solely peculiar to Turkish. They have not been observed in other languages in the same way. There is not a single record of anything similar in languages other than Turkish throughout history.
So what does this mean? How should we interpret this? I had asked these questions, and you did not answer them either. If all these, along with more than 1000 words, 112 drawing-word matches and hundreds of complete sentence readings and some full-page readings, are not sufficient for you to realize that Turkish is present in the content, then I don't know what else to say to you.
Is there any researcher who can show similar repetitions of words (such as quadruplets or quintuplets) in any other language's manuscript?
You cannot do this in any language other than Turkish.
Yes,
Please, I am waiting for your comments on all the overlaps.
It is my hope and belief that Ms. Lisa Fagin Davis may recognized long ago that our assertion regarding the potential presence of Turkish in the content stands as the most compelling possibility. However, I speculate that she may be awaiting interpretation from Turkish language specialists and linguists. Or she may not have had the free time to read our latest articles/posts or follow the developments of our work because she may too busy with her work.
I am also grateful to dear Lisa Fagin Davis for taking the time to review our first paper/work and giving us many valuable advice on how to write an academic article in the most accurate way. I would like to thank her again, here in front of you all. As a family team members, we are lucky to have the chance to benefit from her intelligence and experience.
It's worth noting that many Turkish language experts already extend their congratulations upon successfully interpreting these my paper. You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.
Best regards,