16-04-2024, 03:01 PM
[I don't understand what you are asking. Are you offering to send a Google link? Or is there already some Google link in a previous post that I should know about? I see a lot of plants in post #443 from April 10th. I have no knowledge of any of the plants in post #443.]
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.
[/quote]
Dear piburkshire,
When I share about word and drawing overlaps, I also show these words on the dictionary pages. The reason I did this is for the readers to see that these words exist in Turkish and their meanings. You may not know these plants. I also give the Latin names of most of them. I also find photos of them by searching Google and see how they look. What I mean is this: You can do the same thing without needing to know Turkish. Of course, if you want to do this.
The question we ask is actually very simple. We present a plant name, a drawing and a photo of that plant. We show that this name is found in both VM and modern Turkish. What we are essentially asking you is whether you see this similarity or not. Additionally, when we show words whose phonetic value has not changed in 600 years, we ask what this means in terms of linguistics and VM. In other words, these are the questions in their simplest form, but of course, intermediate questions are also given by us depending on these questions.
In fact, many researchers scan VM drawings first. Than after they search some potential worsd in some languages. Because they compare the plants depicted in the VM drawings to certain plants. For the first time in VM research history, we did the exact opposite. We have been read the VM pages first, then found the plant names. Afterwards, we examined what these names meant and compiled and compared the visuals of these plants. So, we read the texts first and then found the matches. Can you understand the difference?
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.
[/quote]
Dear piburkshire,
When I share about word and drawing overlaps, I also show these words on the dictionary pages. The reason I did this is for the readers to see that these words exist in Turkish and their meanings. You may not know these plants. I also give the Latin names of most of them. I also find photos of them by searching Google and see how they look. What I mean is this: You can do the same thing without needing to know Turkish. Of course, if you want to do this.
The question we ask is actually very simple. We present a plant name, a drawing and a photo of that plant. We show that this name is found in both VM and modern Turkish. What we are essentially asking you is whether you see this similarity or not. Additionally, when we show words whose phonetic value has not changed in 600 years, we ask what this means in terms of linguistics and VM. In other words, these are the questions in their simplest form, but of course, intermediate questions are also given by us depending on these questions.
In fact, many researchers scan VM drawings first. Than after they search some potential worsd in some languages. Because they compare the plants depicted in the VM drawings to certain plants. For the first time in VM research history, we did the exact opposite. We have been read the VM pages first, then found the plant names. Afterwards, we examined what these names meant and compiled and compared the visuals of these plants. So, we read the texts first and then found the matches. Can you understand the difference?