14-04-2024, 10:47 AM
In my previous statement, I mentioned and demonstrated that the names of several different plants drawn in the VM can be read on the pages where these drawings were made without undergoing any phonetic changes over 600 years. When I look at how these plants appear in real life, I see these readings and drawings as corresponding to each other.
However, I'm also curious about the following:
Aren't there linguists and botanists on the Voynich Ninja platform here who can interpret these? If so, can a botanist, for example, tell which plant these drawings resemble the most?
Does one need to know Turkish or be a linguist to find the Turkish equivalents of the words banana, myrtus, sesame, pomegranate in an online dictionary to compare these with the plant names written on these pages by using our ATA alphabet transcription to see a 1/1 phonetic match and express it here in this page?
Are we the only ones who believe that these matches we indicate here on the Voynich Ninja platform are clear matches?
You don't necessarily need to know Turkish to answer these questions. Why is it important to answer these questions on this platform?
Because the author/authors was probably a multilingual person who traveled around Europe at that time and used some words from European languages within Turkish words and sentence structures. Since we cannot read these words, it will be difficult to translate many sentences into today's language. Almost most Turkish linguists (or all as I know) working on the Turkish language are not with great knowledge about Ancient Greek, Latin, or the dialects and languages spoken in medieval Italy. When it becomes clear that the content of the VM is in Turkish, than it may be known that particular European language linguists & Turkologists linguists can be understand that they should have been work together in this VM-reading study in the future. Therefore, we expect researchers in this group to examine, criticize, or express their own opinions about our claims and the correspondences we propose. By doing so, you can contribute to expediting the process.
Thank you for reading.
However, I'm also curious about the following:
Aren't there linguists and botanists on the Voynich Ninja platform here who can interpret these? If so, can a botanist, for example, tell which plant these drawings resemble the most?
Does one need to know Turkish or be a linguist to find the Turkish equivalents of the words banana, myrtus, sesame, pomegranate in an online dictionary to compare these with the plant names written on these pages by using our ATA alphabet transcription to see a 1/1 phonetic match and express it here in this page?
Are we the only ones who believe that these matches we indicate here on the Voynich Ninja platform are clear matches?
You don't necessarily need to know Turkish to answer these questions. Why is it important to answer these questions on this platform?
Because the author/authors was probably a multilingual person who traveled around Europe at that time and used some words from European languages within Turkish words and sentence structures. Since we cannot read these words, it will be difficult to translate many sentences into today's language. Almost most Turkish linguists (or all as I know) working on the Turkish language are not with great knowledge about Ancient Greek, Latin, or the dialects and languages spoken in medieval Italy. When it becomes clear that the content of the VM is in Turkish, than it may be known that particular European language linguists & Turkologists linguists can be understand that they should have been work together in this VM-reading study in the future. Therefore, we expect researchers in this group to examine, criticize, or express their own opinions about our claims and the correspondences we propose. By doing so, you can contribute to expediting the process.
Thank you for reading.