19-02-2024, 06:52 PM
I am really appreciate all of everyone suggestion and input on my finding. I just want to make it clear that my ciphers have rules to follow. The rules come from my finding in the manuscript, so I did not make the rules as I like. For example :
The word Balaustiis can not be translated as abluistis or ebulliistis as tavie suggested, because the word do not start with vowel symbol. ( as I mentioned in my previous post about ciphers rules )
If i just use my ciphers alone ( without the rules) the translation would be BLSTS not Balaustiis.
As I mentioned in my previous post, if we browse the manuscript we will find stand alone symbol, for example we can find some of letter ST symbol. This one symbol should have meaning, that is to form a word. So, if i use my ciphers alone the translation would be ST. It does not have any meaning, for that reason this symbol should have vowel that follows eventhough no vowel symbol written.
As I always explain that I am not latin language expert, so I am hoping anyone in this forum who knows better could work together to make much better translation. Looking forwards on the good news.
The word Balaustiis can not be translated as abluistis or ebulliistis as tavie suggested, because the word do not start with vowel symbol. ( as I mentioned in my previous post about ciphers rules )
If i just use my ciphers alone ( without the rules) the translation would be BLSTS not Balaustiis.
As I mentioned in my previous post, if we browse the manuscript we will find stand alone symbol, for example we can find some of letter ST symbol. This one symbol should have meaning, that is to form a word. So, if i use my ciphers alone the translation would be ST. It does not have any meaning, for that reason this symbol should have vowel that follows eventhough no vowel symbol written.
As I always explain that I am not latin language expert, so I am hoping anyone in this forum who knows better could work together to make much better translation. Looking forwards on the good news.