15-03-2023, 03:13 PM
(This post was last modified: 15-03-2023, 03:47 PM by Ahmet Ardıç.)
Those who think that VMS is written in a natural language, please see this table below. In the selected words in this table (as far as I can follow from the EVA tables), the adjacent vowels according to the EVA table are marked with a yellow background. Please let us know if you can find an answer to my question below by looking at the sequence of the vowels in these words (so much so that there are many similar ones throughout the VM-texts) in this book.
1- Were the words in which the vowels are arranged side by side from the third to the ninth in the spelling of the words in the Old Indo-European languages?
2- Is this kind of word vowel structure seen in any ancient and/or any modern language (included all IE & Semitic languages)?
3- If you see this type of word structure, do you think these words are abbreviated words? If these words are abbreviated words, can only the vowel parts be abbreviated form of an independent word? If you think so, can you give an example of something similar (a word with only vowels or an old word with all consonants droped in an abbreviation) in any ancient language you know?
Or is it more logical to think that these structures are concatenated words (belonging to an agglutinative language such as Turkish)?
4- Could one or more of the letters you think are vowels actually consonants?
The reason why I ask these questions is to encourage you to think differently or to express how we think and form a chain of logic in this detail.
So, what is your opinion about that kind of the vowel form situation. Does the fact that almost all transcription tables and EVA variations made (except ATA transcription) have that kind of multiple vowel structures coming together give researchers a clue that all such transcription proposals and EVA tables are wrong?
Most of the special letters used in the MS book are handwritten equivalents of common Latin alphabet characters. You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view. alphabet transcription is the transcription that contains the largest number of Latin alphabet characters in the same linear-form among the alphabet transcriptions made to date.
For example, using an EVA, you read a C-shaped letter as the letter E, but this C-shaped letter is already the familiar C letter of the Latin alphabet. Are you aware that the alphabet transcription that offers the most overlap with the Latin letters in this way is the ATA alphabet transcription? When the author draws two CCs side by side, this CĞ/G sound is produced. When the author draws two AA letters side by side, this is the AĞ sound. When the author draws two letters ii, this is the iğ/ğ sound. When the author draws two OOs, this is the OĞ sound equivalent. This -ğ ending-sound of the letter consistency continues in a similar way, and when we transcribe these words on the basis of the sound values of the Turkish pronunciation of these letters in this way, we can read all of them. We even have a Turkish reading recommendation for nine vowel repetitions (because some of them not vowel in reality). (Please see this ATA Syllabic Combine Characters Transcriptions You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.)
The word structure of Turkish is not similar to any other language except its own language family. But that doesn't really matter anyway. The only realistic and correct way to read this type of text is to create a correct transcription key. Transcription keys that offer 3 to 9 vowels side by side cannot be the right keys and cannot open the door you want to open.
Thanks
1- Were the words in which the vowels are arranged side by side from the third to the ninth in the spelling of the words in the Old Indo-European languages?
2- Is this kind of word vowel structure seen in any ancient and/or any modern language (included all IE & Semitic languages)?
3- If you see this type of word structure, do you think these words are abbreviated words? If these words are abbreviated words, can only the vowel parts be abbreviated form of an independent word? If you think so, can you give an example of something similar (a word with only vowels or an old word with all consonants droped in an abbreviation) in any ancient language you know?
Or is it more logical to think that these structures are concatenated words (belonging to an agglutinative language such as Turkish)?
4- Could one or more of the letters you think are vowels actually consonants?
The reason why I ask these questions is to encourage you to think differently or to express how we think and form a chain of logic in this detail.
So, what is your opinion about that kind of the vowel form situation. Does the fact that almost all transcription tables and EVA variations made (except ATA transcription) have that kind of multiple vowel structures coming together give researchers a clue that all such transcription proposals and EVA tables are wrong?
Most of the special letters used in the MS book are handwritten equivalents of common Latin alphabet characters. You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view. alphabet transcription is the transcription that contains the largest number of Latin alphabet characters in the same linear-form among the alphabet transcriptions made to date.
For example, using an EVA, you read a C-shaped letter as the letter E, but this C-shaped letter is already the familiar C letter of the Latin alphabet. Are you aware that the alphabet transcription that offers the most overlap with the Latin letters in this way is the ATA alphabet transcription? When the author draws two CCs side by side, this CĞ/G sound is produced. When the author draws two AA letters side by side, this is the AĞ sound. When the author draws two letters ii, this is the iğ/ğ sound. When the author draws two OOs, this is the OĞ sound equivalent. This -ğ ending-sound of the letter consistency continues in a similar way, and when we transcribe these words on the basis of the sound values of the Turkish pronunciation of these letters in this way, we can read all of them. We even have a Turkish reading recommendation for nine vowel repetitions (because some of them not vowel in reality). (Please see this ATA Syllabic Combine Characters Transcriptions You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.)
The word structure of Turkish is not similar to any other language except its own language family. But that doesn't really matter anyway. The only realistic and correct way to read this type of text is to create a correct transcription key. Transcription keys that offer 3 to 9 vowels side by side cannot be the right keys and cannot open the door you want to open.
Thanks