A few remarks and notes:
- The resolution, close to 50% of the Voynich-Final-Sequential_ID (2014) series, is good enough for web browsing, much better than voynichese.com.
- It must have been a lot of work to make the new bounding-boxes (and sometimes rotated boxes and even polygons, that's new and an improvement over voynichese.com). Voynichese.com used the 2004 scan and the coordinates cannot be converted because of perspective: pages aren't flat.
- The transliteration system is interesting and logical. I haven't understood everything but it seems that C and H work like { and } in EVA and " works like ' in EVA so there should be a way to convert between the two formats, I hope.
c stands for Ce
h stands for eH
s stands for c"
- The resolution, close to 50% of the Voynich-Final-Sequential_ID (2014) series, is good enough for web browsing, much better than voynichese.com.
- It must have been a lot of work to make the new bounding-boxes (and sometimes rotated boxes and even polygons, that's new and an improvement over voynichese.com). Voynichese.com used the 2004 scan and the coordinates cannot be converted because of perspective: pages aren't flat.
- The transliteration system is interesting and logical. I haven't understood everything but it seems that C and H work like { and } in EVA and " works like ' in EVA so there should be a way to convert between the two formats, I hope.
c stands for Ce
h stands for eH
s stands for c"