Calgary engineer believes he's cracked the mysterious Voynich Manuscript

[Juan_Sali]

the meaning of ÖD

The combination oq appears 22 times in the whole VMS, if o have several meanings then the different meanings of the combination make it even more marginal. 

You say that the symbol 4 is always followed by the symbol O. However, examining the words here with this approach is one of the many mistakes made very often.
As a result, trying to classify the words you want to examine by making tables in this way can be applied for Indo-European language words. But it is not applicable for Turkish. Here, due to the special and difficult-to-read writing style of the VM texts, it will be necessary to evaluate only and only the words in the form of phrases and sentences with the word in front of them.

But the numbers are clear, this combination represents 5.289 of 5.421. Where is the mistake in the approach? You can evaluate the words one by one, but that will not change the global numbers. The approach of big numbers to understand the relation between symbols is good for any language that uses them, I dont see any reason why turkish should be different.  

Your use of apps like "voynichese" is misleading. Because, for example, you read a single or multiple syllable character as if it were a single letter. Just like the phonetic sign you thought was P. For this reason, the table you have already made is wrong and misleading. Forget the Voynichese app and EVA tables. 

The group of P. I am not reading it in any way. The apps voynichese does not read it in any way. It just count coincidences, and it says than the group of P is preceded by q only 3 times in the whole Vms, and never is followed by q.
My table counts coincidences, there is nothing wrong in it. How do you interpretate the data is the question.