06-09-2022, 10:39 PM
(05-09-2022, 12:17 PM)Ahmet Ardıç wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.Because Turkish words have word-suffixes. These suffixes can refer to the first, second and third persons, as well as contain information such as past, future, present tense etc. Therefore, when the subject person and tense described in some pages change, the phonetic value structure at the end of the word also changes sharply. Therefore, it is thought that "there is a different language in the content", but there is no different language.
The Turkish language is not the only language that has suffixes for first, second and third persons; past, present and future tense. Slovenian has even the suffixes for 3 genders. The distinction for 3 different genders can be found in the VM. Also, Slovenian language has prefixes, which Turkish does not have. And yes, a dialect of Slovenian was spoken in Thessaloniki under the Byzantine Empire in the 9th century. There might be some words still in use, and that could be the reason you cannot read sentences, but are able to adjust your alphabet to approximate those words. Also, Slovenian language has over 600 Sanskrit words, which also might be found in Turkish.
I think the best way to test your theory is to give 5 Turkish academic a copy of one page of the VM text (not your transcription) and your ATA alphabet and let them transcribe and translate the text individually. I suppose if Turkish language was so obvious, they could easy transcribe and translate a page, and the work of all five academics should be at least remotely similar.