06-09-2022, 03:27 PM
(This post was last modified: 06-09-2022, 05:55 PM by Ahmet Ardıç.)
What I write below is not largely about the VM, but is partially related. Those who do not want to read a long article in broken English, please do not read it.
The strange thing is, we can see the same photographic pattern when we look at the word structure of almost all of the old-texts/inscriptions that which have not been read before. (I've been working on some of these for years.)
Writing signs, which Western linguistics call "Runic" typefaces, evolved from tamga signs older than ten thousand years.
The alphabets, which are defined as the Cyrillic alphabet and the Latin alphabet today, evolved from the derivatives of various Runic signs.
Their sound values have changed their phonetic value in certain geographies over time. But even if a tamga (tanım-ımga/imge) sign is more than 10 or 12 thousand years old, their meanings and sound values are still alive in our culture and language. In my book, I explain what I wrote here in a historical and logical order and with pointing some evidence.
The Turkish language and the ancient Turkic language remained a field that European linguists and historians almost and mostly did not know well in details and found it difficult for them to learn.
For this reason, Europeans do not even know that the real origin of many of their words is Turkish, although they have lived close to the Turkish language throughout history and borrowed many words from it.
Many Indo-European words, whose origin is called PIE, have equivalents in the Turkish language that provide close phonetic value and semantic overlap. Moreover, we can show that these words are used in old texts in Turkish.
The science called "etymology" studies the history of words.
While doing this, there must be some scientific criteria and these criteria should not be stretched by political or emotional choices. So it shouldn't matter which language you study the history of the word. The established criteria should be used in the same way when researching the history of words in all languages.
The most important of these criteria is to refer to the oldest written source, which is close to the phonetic value and meaning of a word.
Although European linguists have the oldest written form of Turkish language, they miss this fact and show many words as PIE origin. In fact, there is no proof that there is even a root language called PIE. This concept is a completely fictitious production.
A society that does not know how to count may have learned numeral pronouns from a neighboring society.
Thus, they may have borrowed the number pronouns from the neighboring language.
If you say that languages with similarity in number pronouns come from the same common root, this would be an absurd inference.
For example, Persian is an "Indo-European" language. The number that the Persians say in the form of "YEK" is the number 1. We call the same numeral noun as BİR in the modern Anatolian Turkish language. Do not be surprised if you see this word as VAR > BAR etc. in different Turkic dialects. But this number name also has a synonym as TEK in Turkish.
This is the word "ONE (1)" in Turkish as TEK, and that meanin is both "singular" and "1" .
As you can see, the first number of "Persian language of YEK" (آ / یکی) and the Turkish word "TEK" overlap both phonetically and in meaning. We can establish similar examples between the number pronouns in English and the number pronouns in Turkish too. Etc. ...
For example, VAR (BAR/BİR) > ONE sound conversion should probably have passed from one of the Tatar-Turkish dialects to English as ONE. (VAR > ONE) are words that are close in sound value and overlap in meaning.
The word THREE (3) in English is the sound form of the word DİRİ/TİRİ in old Turkish. This word can be use as the name of the third finger in our hand in Turkish and one of its many meanings in Turkish was (UZUN/DİRİ/İRİ) "longer than the others (it was said for the longer finger)".
The number 2, TWO, means "adjacent finger of to the first finger". It is named as like "the finger which attached to the first finger" in Turkish. The root word is -TU in Turkish and this word is the root word of the verb to hold/attached on in Turkish (TUT-mak). The word, which is a synonym for this, lived in Turkish, but this word did not live long as noun in time. It still lives in our language in action form es a verb only. (TU-TUN-MAK / TUT-MAK).
However, your so-called "linguists", (who introduced the concept of Indo European linguistic root about 300 years ago) said that "if there is an overlap between the number pronouns of the two languages, they must be from a common root." It is also said that the overlap in the names of the parts/organs in body, this indicates the unity of origin of those languages. However, this is also nonsense.
Because, a group of people just learning to speak may have borrowed these words from the neighboring group and are not privileged at this point from other words including numbers.
In addition, there are examples that are similar between Turkish organ names and "organ names called from the PIE language".
I do not want to write a longer article with my broken English by prolonging the examples here. Because my articles provide more than thousand examples. There may be those who think that these have nothing to do with the Voynich book. But if you don't know the origin of your language and are forced to read your 1000-year-old texts, you can take unrealistic paths in the name of science and get lost there. I don't just show read keys for VM texts with our work, and I will start to shake a whole pile of crap to spill out for PIE linguistics with using linguistic methods.
I don't expect to be understood right away. A step-by-step understanding will suffice. First of all, everyone will understand that the VM texts have Turkish content. Then, after reading my articles about other thinks in the area, over time some linguists (who are sober-minded) will begin to perceive what I have said.
Western linguistics has built many imaginary names and towers. Accepting that is same as saying million of articles written in the past by referring PIE roots are garbage. That's when the real Etymology studies will begin, everyone will see and understand this all (in the future). So, This part is not about VM.
I will go step by step
without haste
the smartest linguists will understand first
then after may be many others but not all
Finally, I would like to quote an old and concise saying that I shared on my own page. This phrase was said by the famous thinker Rumi.
(But please don't be offended. So when Mevlana said this, me and all others living now weren't in this world yet. So, he couldn't have told all of us. So, I think I don't need to apologize because this quote is not about you or me or another people here. It's about science and people in general.)
'You can beat forty scholars with one fact, but you can't beat one idiot with forty facts.'
... Mevlana Celaleddin-i Rumi (1207 - 1273)...
I say these succinct words to many academics before I tell them about the subject. The only effect of this actually is that it makes them listen to me more carefully. I also help them understand how wrong it is to throw the results of a family project away without reading it.
Thus, they understand that it is wrong to underestimate those who do not have an academic linguistics degree and give family project, and they perceive that they should not throw away the articles we sent them 5 years ago before they have read them.
The strange thing is, we can see the same photographic pattern when we look at the word structure of almost all of the old-texts/inscriptions that which have not been read before. (I've been working on some of these for years.)
Writing signs, which Western linguistics call "Runic" typefaces, evolved from tamga signs older than ten thousand years.
The alphabets, which are defined as the Cyrillic alphabet and the Latin alphabet today, evolved from the derivatives of various Runic signs.
Their sound values have changed their phonetic value in certain geographies over time. But even if a tamga (tanım-ımga/imge) sign is more than 10 or 12 thousand years old, their meanings and sound values are still alive in our culture and language. In my book, I explain what I wrote here in a historical and logical order and with pointing some evidence.
The Turkish language and the ancient Turkic language remained a field that European linguists and historians almost and mostly did not know well in details and found it difficult for them to learn.
For this reason, Europeans do not even know that the real origin of many of their words is Turkish, although they have lived close to the Turkish language throughout history and borrowed many words from it.
Many Indo-European words, whose origin is called PIE, have equivalents in the Turkish language that provide close phonetic value and semantic overlap. Moreover, we can show that these words are used in old texts in Turkish.
The science called "etymology" studies the history of words.
While doing this, there must be some scientific criteria and these criteria should not be stretched by political or emotional choices. So it shouldn't matter which language you study the history of the word. The established criteria should be used in the same way when researching the history of words in all languages.
The most important of these criteria is to refer to the oldest written source, which is close to the phonetic value and meaning of a word.
Although European linguists have the oldest written form of Turkish language, they miss this fact and show many words as PIE origin. In fact, there is no proof that there is even a root language called PIE. This concept is a completely fictitious production.
A society that does not know how to count may have learned numeral pronouns from a neighboring society.
Thus, they may have borrowed the number pronouns from the neighboring language.
If you say that languages with similarity in number pronouns come from the same common root, this would be an absurd inference.
For example, Persian is an "Indo-European" language. The number that the Persians say in the form of "YEK" is the number 1. We call the same numeral noun as BİR in the modern Anatolian Turkish language. Do not be surprised if you see this word as VAR > BAR etc. in different Turkic dialects. But this number name also has a synonym as TEK in Turkish.
This is the word "ONE (1)" in Turkish as TEK, and that meanin is both "singular" and "1" .
As you can see, the first number of "Persian language of YEK" (آ / یکی) and the Turkish word "TEK" overlap both phonetically and in meaning. We can establish similar examples between the number pronouns in English and the number pronouns in Turkish too. Etc. ...
For example, VAR (BAR/BİR) > ONE sound conversion should probably have passed from one of the Tatar-Turkish dialects to English as ONE. (VAR > ONE) are words that are close in sound value and overlap in meaning.
The word THREE (3) in English is the sound form of the word DİRİ/TİRİ in old Turkish. This word can be use as the name of the third finger in our hand in Turkish and one of its many meanings in Turkish was (UZUN/DİRİ/İRİ) "longer than the others (it was said for the longer finger)".
The number 2, TWO, means "adjacent finger of to the first finger". It is named as like "the finger which attached to the first finger" in Turkish. The root word is -TU in Turkish and this word is the root word of the verb to hold/attached on in Turkish (TUT-mak). The word, which is a synonym for this, lived in Turkish, but this word did not live long as noun in time. It still lives in our language in action form es a verb only. (TU-TUN-MAK / TUT-MAK).
However, your so-called "linguists", (who introduced the concept of Indo European linguistic root about 300 years ago) said that "if there is an overlap between the number pronouns of the two languages, they must be from a common root." It is also said that the overlap in the names of the parts/organs in body, this indicates the unity of origin of those languages. However, this is also nonsense.
Because, a group of people just learning to speak may have borrowed these words from the neighboring group and are not privileged at this point from other words including numbers.
In addition, there are examples that are similar between Turkish organ names and "organ names called from the PIE language".
I do not want to write a longer article with my broken English by prolonging the examples here. Because my articles provide more than thousand examples. There may be those who think that these have nothing to do with the Voynich book. But if you don't know the origin of your language and are forced to read your 1000-year-old texts, you can take unrealistic paths in the name of science and get lost there. I don't just show read keys for VM texts with our work, and I will start to shake a whole pile of crap to spill out for PIE linguistics with using linguistic methods.
I don't expect to be understood right away. A step-by-step understanding will suffice. First of all, everyone will understand that the VM texts have Turkish content. Then, after reading my articles about other thinks in the area, over time some linguists (who are sober-minded) will begin to perceive what I have said.
Western linguistics has built many imaginary names and towers. Accepting that is same as saying million of articles written in the past by referring PIE roots are garbage. That's when the real Etymology studies will begin, everyone will see and understand this all (in the future). So, This part is not about VM.
I will go step by step
without haste
the smartest linguists will understand first
then after may be many others but not all
Finally, I would like to quote an old and concise saying that I shared on my own page. This phrase was said by the famous thinker Rumi.
(But please don't be offended. So when Mevlana said this, me and all others living now weren't in this world yet. So, he couldn't have told all of us. So, I think I don't need to apologize because this quote is not about you or me or another people here. It's about science and people in general.)
'You can beat forty scholars with one fact, but you can't beat one idiot with forty facts.'
... Mevlana Celaleddin-i Rumi (1207 - 1273)...
I say these succinct words to many academics before I tell them about the subject. The only effect of this actually is that it makes them listen to me more carefully. I also help them understand how wrong it is to throw the results of a family project away without reading it.
Thus, they understand that it is wrong to underestimate those who do not have an academic linguistics degree and give family project, and they perceive that they should not throw away the articles we sent them 5 years ago before they have read them.