Calgary engineer believes he's cracked the mysterious Voynich Manuscript

[Ahmet Ardıç]

...Turkish words can be read in every line of 240 pages, but the "unreadable" words make it difficult to read & interpret that sentences as a whole in a short time.

The possible presence of Turkish words does not exclude the possibility of another language in the same paragraph.

Hi Ruby, 

Thank you for the comment. 

It is more likely that there are two different dialects than the content of this book, or that the author deliberately mixed different dialects. It may also be a mistake that some researchers claim that there are two languages in the book based on the statistical structure of the words. However, just because of the content is in Turkish, it is quite possible to assert these misleading results. Because Turkish words have word-suffixes. These suffixes can refer to the first, second and third persons, as well as contain information such as past, future, present tense etc. Therefore, when the subject person and tense described in some pages change, the phonetic value structure at the end of the word also changes sharply. Therefore, it is thought that "there is a different language in the content", but there is no different language.


On the other hand, there is a possibility that words from different languages were used in the sentence structure of the Turkish language by quoting them. The Turkish language, like other languages, borrowed many words from neighboring languages. These are completely normal. The main reason why researchers are wrong here is that they analyze VM-texts with the logic of examining the texts of Indo-European languages.

If the VM-word-structure will analyzed statistically and photographically, it is seen that they are the closest to the modern Turkish language and dialects. We have talked about all of them in these pages here in this voynich ninja page and I have also presented examples. First of all, those who want to advance with statistical and mathematical methods can see the situation more clearly if they proceed based on our ATA alphabet transcription. Because the content is in Turkish. Intelligent people who understand linguistics and know mathematics are the first to understand this fact, and this process has already begun and is progressing. In the near future, many linguists will begin to realize this fact. There is no doubt about it.

As a second-hand booksellers, Voynich was one of the leaders of a network that smuggled many manuscripts and rare books from Ottoman lands to the West during the last period of the Ottoman empire. His theft works resulted in the burning of many libraries in the Ottoman Empire. He probably smuggled over a million manuscripts and rare books to Europe and America. In doing so, they burned at least the same number of rare books and historical manuscripts, along with library buildings, (possibly min. twice as much as they could steal). Later, he also took some of the partially burned books/artifacts himself and smuggled them to Europe too. You can also see that during his lifetime he placed advertisements in many newspapers that he was selling partially burned manuscripts and rare books. Because of this impostor, there was an explosion in the number of oriental manuscripts (in terms of quantity) in Europe and America, coinciding with the same periods (the years he was in this "business"). 

Today, including the VM-manuscript, the reason why many manuscripts in Europe and America have missing pages & partially cut parts and pages is that these pages were torn or cut due to the presence of Ottoman library seals. They produced so-called European tales of ownership for the works, showing some of them as donations from certain people (sometimes as like from well-known rich people). Thus, institutions such as museums and universities, which acquired them, would not be under suspicion in the future, and "history" would be produced about the owners of an artificial past for each of their works in order to erase the dirty parts of their history. 

The dates of his "book seling works" in time and the dates of the building fires, which had a library in the Ottoman Empire, are very close to each other. We also studied fire cases within the same time range before and after that, being throughout his years of business. We examined this in the form of thirty-year periods and a total of 90 years of fire records. When Voynich's years of trading are compared with the periods before and after him, it is seen that the number of fires increased exponentially during his dirty work. We say that the so-called "well known history of the Voynich manuscript & his book business" written to this day, is utter garbage.

We have included many documents and information that we think prove these things in our book. The tales that you & others repeat to each other like as "this book was in the hands of ... such a king etc in the past is just one of the artificial history-making events that made up in Europe. However, produced artificial history through "European" academies are not new issue. 

So, try to look other side if you can. And, there are no different languages in the content. The content is old Turkish, but we often chose to call it TURKIC because we could not distinguish its dialect yet. But this is a temporary situation. 240 pages of the work will also be read, but this process will progressing very slowly.

Sorry for my broken English.

Thanks