26-08-2022, 06:00 PM
And then produce a list of those illustrations for which there is a consensus. As above.
Which VMs researchers, original and modern, should be included? Will they produce a list of the 'most certain' plant ID's?
Is there a consensus on f46v? Costmary was an ID by E. Velinska.
Some VMs illustrations clearly seem to be more realistic than others. But what is the purpose or value of this realism? Is it a guide to something further? Is there a relationship between the illustration and the written text? If so, what is it? If not, then what?
Is all written text equally valid - or is some text marked out as more significant than other examples?
Which VMs researchers, original and modern, should be included? Will they produce a list of the 'most certain' plant ID's?
Is there a consensus on f46v? Costmary was an ID by E. Velinska.
Some VMs illustrations clearly seem to be more realistic than others. But what is the purpose or value of this realism? Is it a guide to something further? Is there a relationship between the illustration and the written text? If so, what is it? If not, then what?
Is all written text equally valid - or is some text marked out as more significant than other examples?

