26-08-2022, 10:49 AM
I don't understand the whole discussion.
They are all references where are quite questionable.
1. an anonymous Finnish biologist? The word "anonymous" says it all.
An anonymous alcoholic who knows the plants because he wakes up every morning in the grass ? Not a serious starting point.
2. Petersen, a priest who has assigned the plants to the new world. Whether he has any knowledge about plants is questionable.
He could not know that the time of the VM was dated before Columbus. Starting point America, therefore everything to be regarded as wrong.
3. Edith Sherwoods, an excerpt around the globe. All without looking at a reference point (pinnacles). It is a nice work, but not a reverence.
4. ELV notebook. It is simply not known enough. No reverence.
On the basis of this information, do you want to make a list of possible plants? You really haven't learned anything over the years.
Translated with You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view. (free version)
They are all references where are quite questionable.
1. an anonymous Finnish biologist? The word "anonymous" says it all.
An anonymous alcoholic who knows the plants because he wakes up every morning in the grass ? Not a serious starting point.
2. Petersen, a priest who has assigned the plants to the new world. Whether he has any knowledge about plants is questionable.
He could not know that the time of the VM was dated before Columbus. Starting point America, therefore everything to be regarded as wrong.
3. Edith Sherwoods, an excerpt around the globe. All without looking at a reference point (pinnacles). It is a nice work, but not a reverence.
4. ELV notebook. It is simply not known enough. No reverence.
On the basis of this information, do you want to make a list of possible plants? You really haven't learned anything over the years.
Translated with You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view. (free version)