Dear Ahmet
I will try again using your terminology. EVA doesnt assign any letter to signs to form a plain text. EVA takes a sign of Voychenese and gives it a name, d a i n and so on. It just renames signs to allow people to refer to them in an easier way, using latin letters, maybe if they had used numbers to rename the signs you werent so confused. EVA is not an alphabet transcription.
You compare ATA alphabet transcription with EVA rename of signs, and both things are different. EVA is not an alphabet transcription, when it renames a sign as d it doest mean that this sign is a D and is read like a D.
I will try again using your terminology. EVA doesnt assign any letter to signs to form a plain text. EVA takes a sign of Voychenese and gives it a name, d a i n and so on. It just renames signs to allow people to refer to them in an easier way, using latin letters, maybe if they had used numbers to rename the signs you werent so confused. EVA is not an alphabet transcription.
You compare ATA alphabet transcription with EVA rename of signs, and both things are different. EVA is not an alphabet transcription, when it renames a sign as d it doest mean that this sign is a D and is read like a D.