21-04-2022, 09:14 AM
(This post was last modified: 21-04-2022, 01:40 PM by Ahmet Ardıç.)
(20-04-2022, 10:42 PM)DonaldFisk wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.[quote="Ahmet Ardıç" pid='50012' dateline='1650471638']
[Before replying, I suggest you read either the books by the Bonfantes and Rex Wallace (the best introductions to the Etruscan language) to learn what is accepted by scholars, rather than fringe theories. Also, please quote sources written in English. Not many people here will know Turkish.
None of this helps your case with the Voynich Manuscript.]
-----------------
We refer to different sources that express completely different views. For this reason, in order to understand the details I have written, you please first examine the structure of Turkish and read the sources I have mentioned.
For example, the alphabet transcriptions made in the sources you read for Etruscan scripts are based on incorrect phonetic mappings.
When this is the case, you do not have any knowledge of what the content in the articles I mentioned means in terms of Turkish and how it should be compared. Do not take this statement as if it were made against you, because most European linguistics working in this kind of transcription works field are in the same situation.
In other words, from the very beginning of this issue, you have been accepted the books and articles written according to the texts that have been read in the form of anagrams with an incorrect (transcription) key as correct. That's why you don't even understand what I'm writing to you.
Etruscan did not have gender in personal names such as Turkish. You can't get these comparisons right by reading the work of the anagram kings of your European academies.
First, read the following authors to start:
Linguist and historian Arif Cengiz Erman
Prof. Dr. Firudin A. Celilov
Prof. Dr. Çhingiz Karaşarlı
Researcher and author Selahi Diker
Engineer and Linguist Kazım Mirşan
Read the books of Research Writer Adile Ayda. (She may have probably written some in Italian.)
In addition, the researcher and writer Fazıl Latipov from Bashkortostan wrote that Etruscans are a Turkic-speaking people by mentioning the overlap in the language structure based on some historical findings and similarities.
In addition, you can read the articles written by Mehmet Turgay Kürüm describing how the Runic inscriptions were read in Turkish on the historical findings that were attributed to the Greek civilization in the Mediterranean or described as unknown by whom.
History and language researcher Cengiz Özakıncı (He has presentations on youtube where he explains Greek and Etruscan history of Turkic connection with evidences. He also summarized very well why and for what reason the concept of Indo European was produced, by whom and by whose order. Etc.)
In order to explain these 14 items to you, I also need to write a book and go into all the details. I don't have the time or energy for that. But it is clear from your answer that there is quite a lack of information. I cannot complete these shortcomings, but you should read more and alternative claims with comparing them.
Your academies should translate the books and articles into their own language. I or anyone else will not do these translations. Translation works are not our area. We write our books and articles in our own language. Moreover, some concepts do not even have an English equivalent, but of course, this is the job of professional translators who can translate at an academic level.
I know that many people here do not speak Turkish. Nobody needs to know Turkish. Just put pressure on your academies and have them translate the articles and history books I mentioned into English.
Thanks for reading,
