16-04-2022, 08:31 PM
(16-04-2022, 08:02 PM)Aga Tentakulus wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.[I don't need any more proof of that. You have just brought it.
You are just trying to justify your language theory with a migration from the Bronze Age 4000 years ago. But it doesn't work like that. It still has no connection to the VM.]
Of course, there is no connection between the Etruscans and the Voynich manuscript. We did not say that there is a connection between these two. But if you look at the Etruscan Runic inscriptions, you'll see that they largely overlap with the Turkish Runic inscriptions. Even though there are thousands of years of difference between the same signs, the researchers I named already read Etruscan writings by matching them to the same or very close sound value. Our goal is not to convince you of a certain idea. In fact, I don't really care whether you believe the information we provide or not. In fact, if a large majority believes in a certain information and a small minority gives information that makes the opposite statement, I would like to go out of my comfort zone and examine these contradictory information thoroughly. Of course, some do not do this when they think their own knowledge is the absolute and only correct one. This is understandable. In fact, you won't believe them even when academies begin to say that we read the Voynich texts. I think that because this goes against the image in your head. However, I have been working on old Turkish languages and scripts for about 30 years and I think the clear results we have achieved in this field are about to be accepted by academies.
Kind regards