04-04-2022, 07:28 PM
Dear Cvetka,
I understand you. It's probably true that when you compare the Slovenian language you also see various overlaps. However, it is not possible to read these texts only by asserting them. It is necessary to show complete sentences and a large number of drawings and noun overlaps. It should also be expected that the proposed transcription will offer some reading or full reading of all approximately 240 pages. If these texts are written in a natural language, as they are, then there should be multiple and total overlaps in the whole content and in various structures, not fragmentary overlaps. Our goal is to be able to read the entire manuscript and translate it into today's language. For this we need support of linguists and volunteers to participate in the reading works with ATA.
Please let me tell you clearly. There are multiple Turkish words on every line of every page of this manuscript in Turkish, and about 20% of them have not changed their phonetic value (partially excluding minor vocal differences) in the intervening 600 years. That's clear. And we have identified 92 drawing name matches, and some of them still live in our language today, without changing their phonetic value. We do not just say this in words, we show them in old dictionaries. Moreover, we read many complete sentences.
This rate will increase exponentially as the reading progresses, because we have been look only at 10% of the work in great detail yet.
If you don't see all of these as Slovenian, then I think you may have gone a little too far down the anagram path.
EVA-daiin is not only Turkish suffix -SAM in ATA transcription. We do not read the part read in the EVA only in SAM format as a word suffix. Since I have written about this subject in detail here before, I will not mention the same details here again.
Kind regards
I understand you. It's probably true that when you compare the Slovenian language you also see various overlaps. However, it is not possible to read these texts only by asserting them. It is necessary to show complete sentences and a large number of drawings and noun overlaps. It should also be expected that the proposed transcription will offer some reading or full reading of all approximately 240 pages. If these texts are written in a natural language, as they are, then there should be multiple and total overlaps in the whole content and in various structures, not fragmentary overlaps. Our goal is to be able to read the entire manuscript and translate it into today's language. For this we need support of linguists and volunteers to participate in the reading works with ATA.
Please let me tell you clearly. There are multiple Turkish words on every line of every page of this manuscript in Turkish, and about 20% of them have not changed their phonetic value (partially excluding minor vocal differences) in the intervening 600 years. That's clear. And we have identified 92 drawing name matches, and some of them still live in our language today, without changing their phonetic value. We do not just say this in words, we show them in old dictionaries. Moreover, we read many complete sentences.
This rate will increase exponentially as the reading progresses, because we have been look only at 10% of the work in great detail yet.
If you don't see all of these as Slovenian, then I think you may have gone a little too far down the anagram path.
EVA-daiin is not only Turkish suffix -SAM in ATA transcription. We do not read the part read in the EVA only in SAM format as a word suffix. Since I have written about this subject in detail here before, I will not mention the same details here again.
Kind regards