08-10-2021, 07:19 PM
(This post was last modified: 08-10-2021, 07:23 PM by Ahmet Ardıç.)
[quote="joben" pid='47511' dateline='1633711005']
Hi Joben,
Yes, I think you are right on this detail. However, our aim is not to increase the interest in our theory or to prevent this interest from falling. Our main aim is to express our ideas based on our own work. In fact, the reason we came to these issues started with the claim that we named our alphabet transcription and/or the VM alphabet as Turkish, and we were told that we couldn't do that. In reality, we have not named a transcript anywhere but on our own website. So I don't know who did this, but it's not us. We named the alphabet and transcription as ATA. The abbreviation T here does not mean Turkish. It means TEAM. Anyway. In terms of EVA, this is a subject that is the choice of the person who named it. Since we were asked why we use the name-description of "Turkish" as a noun, we have given the example with the name EVA so that the person asking this question can make an analogy comparison.
In other words, there is no logical difference between calling this alphabet as TURKISH or calling it as EUROPEAN. We reminded the subject of EVA when the perception was created as if we used a name TURKISH, but the claimer himself probably did not comparing in analogy by doing empathy in same way. In this sense, someone using the name EVA should not have anything to say to someone who may call this alphabet TURKISH in the future.
As far as I know, EVA is the abbreviation of European Voynich Alphabet. Moreover, there is no data about whether the author is European or not. We say that the author used Turkish in the content of the work.
Actually, I don't think that those who named EVA have bad intentions and are intentional. However, saying European or Turkish is actually two examples in the same situation. And seeing one of this as logical, while the other is treated as an irrational is not to be understandable. In my opinion this kind of thoughts are only can be named as "without empathy products".
So we cannot look at these issues with a double standard. We just have to use the way of science. For example, those who tell us to show sentence analysis are completely right. We've already done that. Since they are in Turkish and written by us by hand and taking notes on paper, it is necessary to first digitize them and then translate them into English. But of course we will do that and share in English too.
Thanks
Hi Joben,
Yes, I think you are right on this detail. However, our aim is not to increase the interest in our theory or to prevent this interest from falling. Our main aim is to express our ideas based on our own work. In fact, the reason we came to these issues started with the claim that we named our alphabet transcription and/or the VM alphabet as Turkish, and we were told that we couldn't do that. In reality, we have not named a transcript anywhere but on our own website. So I don't know who did this, but it's not us. We named the alphabet and transcription as ATA. The abbreviation T here does not mean Turkish. It means TEAM. Anyway. In terms of EVA, this is a subject that is the choice of the person who named it. Since we were asked why we use the name-description of "Turkish" as a noun, we have given the example with the name EVA so that the person asking this question can make an analogy comparison.
In other words, there is no logical difference between calling this alphabet as TURKISH or calling it as EUROPEAN. We reminded the subject of EVA when the perception was created as if we used a name TURKISH, but the claimer himself probably did not comparing in analogy by doing empathy in same way. In this sense, someone using the name EVA should not have anything to say to someone who may call this alphabet TURKISH in the future.
As far as I know, EVA is the abbreviation of European Voynich Alphabet. Moreover, there is no data about whether the author is European or not. We say that the author used Turkish in the content of the work.
Actually, I don't think that those who named EVA have bad intentions and are intentional. However, saying European or Turkish is actually two examples in the same situation. And seeing one of this as logical, while the other is treated as an irrational is not to be understandable. In my opinion this kind of thoughts are only can be named as "without empathy products".
So we cannot look at these issues with a double standard. We just have to use the way of science. For example, those who tell us to show sentence analysis are completely right. We've already done that. Since they are in Turkish and written by us by hand and taking notes on paper, it is necessary to first digitize them and then translate them into English. But of course we will do that and share in English too.
Thanks