06-10-2021, 09:26 AM
[quote="Koen G" pid='47480' dateline='1633470658']
Yes the burden of proof is with the one who makes the claim for sure.
Actually, I do not expect anyone to confirm our claim on this page. Linguists who work on the Turkish language will examine this in detail. Some linguists have already done this review and have also announced that there is Turkish content in the manuscript. Moreover, we did not ask them to explain whether there is Turkish content in the writing.
As I mentioned before, this verification was done by mathematics itself. For this reason, we do not ask any academic to approve our study. It seems unreasonable to me to say this, and we don't want that from anyone. So, in this case the proof of this claim already done by math formulas itself any way. So, what we are doing now, we are trying the translate more VM texts from old Turkic to todays Turkey Turkish in our free time only, and sharing some info about the work to give update for others.
My aim is to analyze the Turkish sentences in the content of this manuscript one by one and publish new books from them in future. I guess we and no one here is in a rush.
Moreover, every ordinary citizen who speaks Turkish cannot read this writing comfortably. Because the author's dialect is unconventional and there are indications that the author created this alphabet to make the words especially difficult to read. That's why we preferred to call this VM texts as Turkic but not Turkish in our first article. However today, since about %21 of the VM words not much change, anyone who speaks Turkish can do across-reading.
Everything will become clearer over time. Our work is not complete yet, but it will continue for a long time after today. The sentence analyzes you would like to see, will be shared by us for sure, after they are reviewed by us one by one.
Thanks for reading,
Yes the burden of proof is with the one who makes the claim for sure.
Actually, I do not expect anyone to confirm our claim on this page. Linguists who work on the Turkish language will examine this in detail. Some linguists have already done this review and have also announced that there is Turkish content in the manuscript. Moreover, we did not ask them to explain whether there is Turkish content in the writing.
As I mentioned before, this verification was done by mathematics itself. For this reason, we do not ask any academic to approve our study. It seems unreasonable to me to say this, and we don't want that from anyone. So, in this case the proof of this claim already done by math formulas itself any way. So, what we are doing now, we are trying the translate more VM texts from old Turkic to todays Turkey Turkish in our free time only, and sharing some info about the work to give update for others.
My aim is to analyze the Turkish sentences in the content of this manuscript one by one and publish new books from them in future. I guess we and no one here is in a rush.
Moreover, every ordinary citizen who speaks Turkish cannot read this writing comfortably. Because the author's dialect is unconventional and there are indications that the author created this alphabet to make the words especially difficult to read. That's why we preferred to call this VM texts as Turkic but not Turkish in our first article. However today, since about %21 of the VM words not much change, anyone who speaks Turkish can do across-reading.
Everything will become clearer over time. Our work is not complete yet, but it will continue for a long time after today. The sentence analyzes you would like to see, will be shared by us for sure, after they are reviewed by us one by one.
Thanks for reading,