Cvetka's Slovenian Theory Thread

[Battler]

Some of the supposed Slovenian words I see Cvetka claims are in the Voynich manuscript, make absolutely no sense. How would the word "daror" be formed? There is no "-or" suffix in any Slavic language that would be used here, aside from loaned suffixes.

Another thing I notice is the usual mistake made by Slovenian linguists, which is to try to fit modern Slovenian into an old text. The most infamous example of that is the "Slovenian interpretation" of the Venetic inscriptions, which essentially claims they are in modern Slovenian, which would be impossible given the time they're from. I think the same is here. Is there any evidence that the imperative of "dati" ("to give") in 15th century Slovenian was "daj"?

Also, "ldi" for "ljudi" is specifically the Ljubljana dialect, and at that, the modern Ljubljana dialect. I'm not sure that form existed at all in the 15th century. Granted, Stična is from near Ljubljana, so at least geographically it makes sense. Though it has to be considered that, Ljubljana being a major Urban center, it was likely subject to very rapid language change, so who knows how the Ljubljana dialect of the 15th century even sounded.

I have to say that Slavic is the very first thing I tried with the Manuscript (and I also speak a number of other Slavic languages in addition to Slovenian, and am also a bit familiar with Old Church Slavonic), and I couldn't make any progress in that direction, so I discarded the possibility entirely.