I wholeheartedly agree with tavie's post. Your Turkish theory started out with an unusual amount of goodwill from an unusual amount of forum members. Many people, including myself, *wanted* this to be the one that finally solved it. You can read the first posts in this thread to see how people were looking forward to learning more about it.
So it is not unwillingness. But you are far from the first Voynich theorist to blame his audience for the rejection of his theory, it is the standard reflex. Gerard Cheshire for example did just the same. The manuscript makes them believe that they are right, so they don't understand why others don't see the same truth.
But the burden of proof is with the one who makes the claim. If you don't find the acceptance you desire, this means that your proof is not strong enough yet. Or that you are simply wrong.
So it is not unwillingness. But you are far from the first Voynich theorist to blame his audience for the rejection of his theory, it is the standard reflex. Gerard Cheshire for example did just the same. The manuscript makes them believe that they are right, so they don't understand why others don't see the same truth.
But the burden of proof is with the one who makes the claim. If you don't find the acceptance you desire, this means that your proof is not strong enough yet. Or that you are simply wrong.


![[+]](https://www.voynich.ninja/images/collapse_collapsed.png)