29-06-2020, 12:49 PM
This is all quite interesting!
With respect to Eva, let me put the question / comment in perspective.
Obviously, cht and tch are anagrams of each other.
Now should cTh not also be seen as an anagram of both?
A question that can't be answered but I tend to think that it makes sense.
So, in that respect, Eva is superior to all other alphabets
(except of course Frogguy)
On the real question, anagrams are determined based on word boundaries, which are notoriously uncertain.
The results shown seem to be based on one of the Takeshi transliterations.
I wonder how different they would be for the other ones, with or without uncertain spaces.
Undoubtedly, they will still be high, but there could be considerable variation.
I have all the files available, but not the tool to check for anagrams...
With respect to Eva, let me put the question / comment in perspective.
Obviously, cht and tch are anagrams of each other.
Now should cTh not also be seen as an anagram of both?
A question that can't be answered but I tend to think that it makes sense.
So, in that respect, Eva is superior to all other alphabets
(except of course Frogguy) On the real question, anagrams are determined based on word boundaries, which are notoriously uncertain.
The results shown seem to be based on one of the Takeshi transliterations.
I wonder how different they would be for the other ones, with or without uncertain spaces.
Undoubtedly, they will still be high, but there could be considerable variation.
I have all the files available, but not the tool to check for anagrams...