Voynich anagramming

[doranchak]

You mean something like this ?

Perfect - thanks!

Results are attached.
Sample for Voynichese:

%coverage wordlength sortedletters anagrams
1.459642 2 lo [lo, ol]
1.3804572 4 cdehy [dchey, chedy, cheyd, yched]
1.1640184 2 dehsy [shedy, dshey]
1.0584384 3 chlo [olch, chol, lcho]
0.992451 2 or [or, ro]
0.9317426 2 ar [ar, ra]
0.9106266 2 cehy [echy, chey]
0.8156047 4 deekoqy [qekeody, qoekedy, qokeedy, qkeeody]
0.7496173 2 ehsy [shey, yshe]
0.7232223 2 dy [dy, yd]

Sample interpretation:

• 1.3804572:  1.3804572% of the entire Voynich text is represented by these words that are anagrams of each other.
  
• 4:  This group has 4 anagrams
  
• cdehy:  The sorted letters shared by each word.
  
• [dchey, chedy, cheyd, yched]:  The anagrams
  

Sample for English:

%coverage wordlength sortedletters anagrams
3.1306357 3 adn [dan, and, dna]
1.0553013 2 no [no, on]
1.0246451 2 asw [was, saw]
0.8078868 2 as [as, sa]
0.5659407 2 fmor [form, from]
0.5438335 3 aer [are, era, ear]
0.48521057 2 hist [hits, this]
0.4244203 2 an [na, an]
0.39555076 2 ahs [ash, has]
0.39310804 2 not [not, ton]

Seems like Voynichese has stronger "anagrammability" than English.
Would be interesting to compare this with other languages.
If other languages are highly anagrammable, then why?