26-02-2020, 11:50 AM
The presence of such anomalous glyphs for me supports the hope of the significance of the text.
What do the glyphs in Figure 1 and 2 have in common?
They are based on eva-s, only in the first case added ך, and in the second - “e”. Perhaps this was done when checking the text to ensure the unambiguous reading of the word.
As a basis for examples 3-7, eva-v can be considered. The remaining glyphs are obtained by adding one (several) elementary strokes.
For examples 8-11, the base is code 202 v101, which in turn can be decomposed as i + /.
More than 95% of abnormal glyphs can be decomposed into elementary strokes. The difficulty arises with strokes ⌠ , ℓ, °, which appear in the manuscript less than 10 times.
Example 12 also points to the “significance” of the text, where a dark eva-i was added when checking the text, despite the fact that the word does not provide a gap between the letters.
Earlier, I gave 2 examples with a double loop on the right leg of the gallows.
Example 13 is another illustration. Both loops are additionally circled by a single dark outline. If the number of loops does not matter, then why did it, because it is much easier to paint over both loops with a combined blot?
What do the glyphs in Figure 1 and 2 have in common?
They are based on eva-s, only in the first case added ך, and in the second - “e”. Perhaps this was done when checking the text to ensure the unambiguous reading of the word.
As a basis for examples 3-7, eva-v can be considered. The remaining glyphs are obtained by adding one (several) elementary strokes.
For examples 8-11, the base is code 202 v101, which in turn can be decomposed as i + /.
More than 95% of abnormal glyphs can be decomposed into elementary strokes. The difficulty arises with strokes ⌠ , ℓ, °, which appear in the manuscript less than 10 times.
Example 12 also points to the “significance” of the text, where a dark eva-i was added when checking the text, despite the fact that the word does not provide a gap between the letters.
Earlier, I gave 2 examples with a double loop on the right leg of the gallows.
Example 13 is another illustration. Both loops are additionally circled by a single dark outline. If the number of loops does not matter, then why did it, because it is much easier to paint over both loops with a combined blot?