Transliteration fun

[Stephen Carlson]

Rene, I don't think I had seen these things before. One's general impression of the MS is that the system is followed rigorously, so why these deviations?

I agree that they look deliberately formed. But what are they? Just rare characters, like a text in Dutch might contain only one "x"? 
Scribal slip?
And if so, influence from Voynichese or from his "native" writing system?

These are exactly the questions I am asking myself.

If the text were meaningless or some kind of a 'fake',  I would not expect these things to happen, but that hardly qualifies as evidence. Just a hint or a suggestion.

Actually, I would expect these things to happen if it were a meaningless fake, because despite all appearances of one, we're not really dealing with a (strictly controlled) alphabet but something meant to look like one. But then again, my expectation hardly qualifies as evidence.