f65r - extensive attack

[RenegadeHealer]

That second occurrence is not the same as far as i can tell. Looks like otccam or otcaim or even otcccim but there seems to be an extra c in there compaired to otaim

oteaim is my call for the vord on You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view. that David is comparing in his original post. I agree with you about Voynichese.com, Linda. I double check any reading that that page gives me, and find a lot of them are disputable at the very least.

I find myself searching on Voynichese.com for vords that begin with the same characters, and are substantially the same except for the last one or two characters, and/or only a Grove gallows or a [q] at the beginning. My reasoning for doing this is that if Voynichese represents either a natural language in the plaintext or a constructed language, then taking into account the rigid arrangement possibilities of characters in a vord, it likely contains some type of inflection. Thus, when I search for otea*, it returns such interesting results as otear as a zodiac label on f70v1. You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view. becomes a very interesting page for this search: it contains one otear, one qotear, one oteaiin, and three close occurrences of oteal. Could these be different grammatical forms of one root word? Or related words with related meanings?

I see a potential foothold for attempts at decipherment in vords that are neither common nor unique, and have between 2 and ~20 tokens. The reason for this is that it's easy to keep track of and compare the different tokens' occurrences. Vords that start with otea-, for example, show a striking preference for zodiac labels, and for one particular all-text page (f103v). This feels slightly better than clutching at straws.