03-01-2020, 05:14 PM
We are going to take apart You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view. , to show CLEARLY what I am doing with the Voynich. I will use English only, and go from left to right, so everyone can follow along. And I will try to this in the simplest way possible.
King James Bible reads: “And God said unto Moses, I AM THAT I AM: and he said, Thus shalt thou say unto the children of Israel, I AM hath sent me unto you.”
Hebrew: “vyamr alhym el-mshh ahyh ashr ahyh oyamr kh thamr lbny yshral ahyh shhlchny alybm. (I utilized the sounds for the Cheth – ch, Shin – sh, and Thav – th for clarity sake)
Reading to English from the ROOT BASE definitions of Hebrew words without the addition of ‘and, but, or, to etc…’ which comes out garbled in VSO order:
“Said God El Moses exist (a state of being) guide/blessed exist said this said son Israel exist throw/cast according to.” Last word alybm which means ‘according to’ was not translated in the bible and neither was El.
So for clarity’s sake again, I am not translating a proper syntax. I am however pulling out Root base words, to gain an understanding of what is being conveyed in the Voynich. The structure of the Voynich language is similar to biblical Aramaic Hebrew in the Bible, yet different with multiple agglutinative word usage. I theorize it is the lost language of the Khazars, whose language and writing went extinct in the 13th Century.
Does that mean my theory cannot change with new information? Absolutely not.
Do I have definitions wrong? Absolutely, as you can see above. I try to use the most popular definition of a word, unless the sentence is showing something that brings out more clarity.
Will someone else ‘chose’ a different definition of a root word? Probably since one word can have multiple meanings.
King James Bible reads: “And God said unto Moses, I AM THAT I AM: and he said, Thus shalt thou say unto the children of Israel, I AM hath sent me unto you.”
Hebrew: “vyamr alhym el-mshh ahyh ashr ahyh oyamr kh thamr lbny yshral ahyh shhlchny alybm. (I utilized the sounds for the Cheth – ch, Shin – sh, and Thav – th for clarity sake)
Reading to English from the ROOT BASE definitions of Hebrew words without the addition of ‘and, but, or, to etc…’ which comes out garbled in VSO order:
“Said God El Moses exist (a state of being) guide/blessed exist said this said son Israel exist throw/cast according to.” Last word alybm which means ‘according to’ was not translated in the bible and neither was El.
So for clarity’s sake again, I am not translating a proper syntax. I am however pulling out Root base words, to gain an understanding of what is being conveyed in the Voynich. The structure of the Voynich language is similar to biblical Aramaic Hebrew in the Bible, yet different with multiple agglutinative word usage. I theorize it is the lost language of the Khazars, whose language and writing went extinct in the 13th Century.
Does that mean my theory cannot change with new information? Absolutely not.
Do I have definitions wrong? Absolutely, as you can see above. I try to use the most popular definition of a word, unless the sentence is showing something that brings out more clarity.
Will someone else ‘chose’ a different definition of a root word? Probably since one word can have multiple meanings.