04-08-2019, 09:57 PM
(This post was last modified: 04-08-2019, 09:59 PM by LisaFaginDavis.)
I believe they are arguing that the VMS is a phonemic transcription of a spoken dialect of medieval Turkic (as opposed to a written alphabetic language), so I'm not sure if the usual linguistic analyses are relevant. But I haven't read their forthcoming work, so I'm not sure.
Also, the acrostics are said to be in addition to the primary text, not instead of it.
Also, the acrostics are said to be in addition to the primary text, not instead of it.
![[+]](https://www.voynich.ninja/images/collapse_collapsed.png)