The VMS plants are quite carefully drawn. The ones that are recognizable are pretty accurate as to leaf arrangement, leaf margins, etc. There are some that are stylized and some that appear to be mnemonic, but the naturalistic ones aren't as bad as some people think.
If you got the plant ID from Sherwood's site, you should know that about 60% of Sherwood's IDs are questionable, some are highly questionable, and there's one that shows unequivocably that she is not familiar with plants.
.
Your claim that eating bladder campion roots is "lost knowledge" is not scientifically supported. It sounds like a way to justify a very questionable plant ID.
Why don't you show a translation of the parts of Voynichese that say that and you might convince us.
If you got the plant ID from Sherwood's site, you should know that about 60% of Sherwood's IDs are questionable, some are highly questionable, and there's one that shows unequivocably that she is not familiar with plants.
.
Your claim that eating bladder campion roots is "lost knowledge" is not scientifically supported. It sounds like a way to justify a very questionable plant ID.
Why don't you show a translation of the parts of Voynichese that say that and you might convince us.