geoffreycaveney's Judaeo-Greek theory

[ReneZ]

My original objections are just being confirmed at each post.

- The Voynich text is converted into a string of text that is not really meaningful.
- This conversion includes a large number of inconsistent changes.
- The not really meaningful text is then adapted to a string of words in some language (here: Greek, but really a mixture of classical and medieval Greek).
- This final text is not grammatical and needs to be further explained.

A correct interpretation immediately leads to a reasonable plain text.

It would also be possible to clearly describe how this plain text resulted into the Voynich MS text.

What we have here is a proposed solution that behaves exactly like all the failed solutions we have seen in the past, namely:
- a great amount of freedom in converting characters
- a plain text that does not really mean anything

At the same time we are told why this solution that does not look right is still right, namely:
- it is a mixture of various levels of Greek
- there is deliberate obfuscation by the original author

The identification of a word that points to hebrew culture is also not at all convincing.
This is a word (in Voynichese) of which it is pointed out that it only appears once in the entire MS.
This word in Voynichese also has several characters that can be mapped to many different plain text characters. I count the number of options below:


[ch][e][d][k][a][l][y]  : [5][4][6][3][5][2][2]

(Mistakes not excluded).