Hi Geoffrey,
I have asked the admins to move here your post in "Successful translation": it will be more convenient for both threads.
From what you write, I understand the ambiguity of your system is OK for you, as well as the ungrammaticality of the nominative "eros" appearing instead of the accusative.
The obvious question is: of all the many thousands of ungrammatical sentences that would have more or less matched the consonants in your "first step", why did you choose the one that you interpret as "a solitary thursos wants love"? Why is this particular sentence meaningful to you?
I have asked the admins to move here your post in "Successful translation": it will be more convenient for both threads.
From what you write, I understand the ambiguity of your system is OK for you, as well as the ungrammaticality of the nominative "eros" appearing instead of the accusative.
The obvious question is: of all the many thousands of ungrammatical sentences that would have more or less matched the consonants in your "first step", why did you choose the one that you interpret as "a solitary thursos wants love"? Why is this particular sentence meaningful to you?