If we additionally remove all o, which sometimes is suggested to be a null, then we have h1 = 3.79, h2 = 2.43, h1-h2 = 1.36. This is slightly better, but far not good (as compared with natural languages).
Technically, what one could do in this direction is try to remove different characters and see how it affects h1-h2, in an attempt to detect the possible null. (It's unlikely that a medieval scholar would use more than one character for a null). But the results will of course depend on transcription, so different transcriptions need be considered.
Technically, what one could do in this direction is try to remove different characters and see how it affects h1-h2, in an attempt to detect the possible null. (It's unlikely that a medieval scholar would use more than one character for a null). But the results will of course depend on transcription, so different transcriptions need be considered.

