01-03-2018, 11:03 PM
The video is a tease.
They say there are about 60 combination glyphs. This is AFTER identifying the two-dozen individual glyphs, but they only show one (and they give several interpretations for that one glyph).
So... you have to wonder, did they apply their substitution code to a sentence and discover it didn't create very many legitimate words, and then start adding "combinations" to explain or change the tokens that didn't translate?
If so... then they might have 2,000 "combination" glyphs by the time they are finished translating the entire manuscript. Unfortunately, once again, there's not enough info in the video for us to know.
They say there are about 60 combination glyphs. This is AFTER identifying the two-dozen individual glyphs, but they only show one (and they give several interpretations for that one glyph).
So... you have to wonder, did they apply their substitution code to a sentence and discover it didn't create very many legitimate words, and then start adding "combinations" to explain or change the tokens that didn't translate?
If so... then they might have 2,000 "combination" glyphs by the time they are finished translating the entire manuscript. Unfortunately, once again, there's not enough info in the video for us to know.