Can VM be written in vowelless Latin?
#28
Thanks to everyone who has spent time reading and commenting my "papers", messages, etc.
I should probably explain some points (I assume that after that many will put me in one cozy group with well-known user, but I don't care of it anymore)

1) It's not Latin. It's some peculiar form of Latin. But still every word is acceptable by Whitaker's dictionary algorithm (I don't say Whitaker's dictionary, because now I use only his source files and his approach, but the program itself was rewritten). Except for:
a) words are allowed to jump to other declensions, conjugations, genders (which is common for medieval times)
b) one base form of word is used to produce derivations (typically 2nd form)
c) words of 3rd noun declensions, which IMHO are special

2) It's not true that daiin is illī, chey is cartus and so on. It's true that illī is daiin, cartus is chey, a bit different principleSmile (which is not complete true however, due to existence of abbreviation glyphs, such as m, g, pair y and f).

3) The work in this direction will continue because of some reasons. One of them being that the process from very beginning was converging, not developing.
Reply


Messages In This Thread
RE: Can VM be written in vowelless Latin? - by farmerjohn - 20-10-2017, 10:46 AM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 7 Guest(s)