15-09-2017, 02:37 PM
ok, I understand because Voynich is still a mistery, if all researcher are like you...
Beinecke Library and Yale Library are two different things and I tried to ask 1200 DPI to Beinecke, I was ready to pay, but nothing.
That's why I asked if someone would have some image with more resolution but Beinecke have the monopoly.
If Beinecke share or sell only one folio with 1200 DPI resolution I give the solution
Only after Mr. Zandbergen microscopic image we can certainly determine the resolution necessary for deciphering.
first hypotesis, I am not a magician:
microscopic image: 3000 DPI excessive, maybe good for the first and last page
image 1200 DPI: very good for deciphering
image 800 DPI: mmhhh, quite good, you can anyway decipher
image 400/600 DPI not enough for deciphering.
I bought some images 400 DPI from Beinecke when they weren't still online and I paid money, no problem. (order n.Beinecke 2014-73740-m: Bianchi/Voynich)
Maybe microscopic view we have seen is not the only one...
about gold:
I indicated gold because is a very ductile metal but of course I don't know in which metal were built stencils and pen-nib.
In my last video I build a brass stencil to show that this writing system is possible.
Now to read Voynich we don't necessary need stencils because we can map microscopic symbols with a CAD program.
That's what I'm trying to do but resolution is not enough.
But why, if you are one of Beinecke's staff, instead of challenging my thesis you don't share a 1200 DPI scan?
greetings Giuseppe Bianchi
Beinecke Library and Yale Library are two different things and I tried to ask 1200 DPI to Beinecke, I was ready to pay, but nothing.
That's why I asked if someone would have some image with more resolution but Beinecke have the monopoly.
If Beinecke share or sell only one folio with 1200 DPI resolution I give the solution
Only after Mr. Zandbergen microscopic image we can certainly determine the resolution necessary for deciphering.
first hypotesis, I am not a magician:
microscopic image: 3000 DPI excessive, maybe good for the first and last page
image 1200 DPI: very good for deciphering
image 800 DPI: mmhhh, quite good, you can anyway decipher
image 400/600 DPI not enough for deciphering.
I bought some images 400 DPI from Beinecke when they weren't still online and I paid money, no problem. (order n.Beinecke 2014-73740-m: Bianchi/Voynich)
Maybe microscopic view we have seen is not the only one...
about gold:
I indicated gold because is a very ductile metal but of course I don't know in which metal were built stencils and pen-nib.
In my last video I build a brass stencil to show that this writing system is possible.
Now to read Voynich we don't necessary need stencils because we can map microscopic symbols with a CAD program.
That's what I'm trying to do but resolution is not enough.
But why, if you are one of Beinecke's staff, instead of challenging my thesis you don't share a 1200 DPI scan?
greetings Giuseppe Bianchi