Per the link you posted, Beinecke's 1200 DPI scans start at $25 per capture: if this is so important to you, why haven't you ordered one already?
Instead you have consistently lied about Beinecke withholding scans, when you have known all along that they are available for a price.
You expect others to fund the scans, the gold etc, and as you explain above, you'd rather spend your own money on other things. How can anyone possibly be expected to buy into this fraud?
Your own statements from this thread:
About resolution:
On 12/29/16: "with a close photo or at least 600/700 DPI enlargement I give the solution"
On 04/01/17: "I don't understand and many people who e-mail me doesn't understand why beinecke don't share one Folio (one only Folio) enlarged, it should costs nothing! and I give you the solution".
26/07/2017: "400 DPI Beinecke enlargements are not enough, I need at least 700/800 DPI".
01/08/2017: "MATERIAL (ENLARGEMENTS) EXISTS BUT THEY DON'T WANT TO SHARE IT ".
Then suddenly your requirements went up:
13/09/2017: "with 1200 DPI enlargements we can easily decipher Voynich... but since Beinecke smarties don’t share enlargements we can do nothing".
About gold:
On 04/01/17 you said: "Gold is a ductile metal that can adapt to various shapes because it is very workable, I think also stencils were made with gold."
On 27/07/2017: "I used a brass foil about 0.2 mm. thick, more workable if gold".
Today: "you see, we don't need golden stencils (glod is a ductile metal)".
I will let others draw their own conclusions.
Instead you have consistently lied about Beinecke withholding scans, when you have known all along that they are available for a price.
You expect others to fund the scans, the gold etc, and as you explain above, you'd rather spend your own money on other things. How can anyone possibly be expected to buy into this fraud?
Your own statements from this thread:
About resolution:
On 12/29/16: "with a close photo or at least 600/700 DPI enlargement I give the solution"
On 04/01/17: "I don't understand and many people who e-mail me doesn't understand why beinecke don't share one Folio (one only Folio) enlarged, it should costs nothing! and I give you the solution".
26/07/2017: "400 DPI Beinecke enlargements are not enough, I need at least 700/800 DPI".
01/08/2017: "MATERIAL (ENLARGEMENTS) EXISTS BUT THEY DON'T WANT TO SHARE IT ".
Then suddenly your requirements went up:
13/09/2017: "with 1200 DPI enlargements we can easily decipher Voynich... but since Beinecke smarties don’t share enlargements we can do nothing".
About gold:
On 04/01/17 you said: "Gold is a ductile metal that can adapt to various shapes because it is very workable, I think also stencils were made with gold."
On 27/07/2017: "I used a brass foil about 0.2 mm. thick, more workable if gold".
Today: "you see, we don't need golden stencils (glod is a ductile metal)".
I will let others draw their own conclusions.