(26-07-2017, 11:46 AM)Wolfgang99 wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.(25-07-2017, 09:49 AM)Koen Gh. wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.Wolfgang, your solution is worthless if you need others to use it for you. If you are certain about your system, you should be able to decipher the Voynich yourself.
as I said ad nauseam, 400 DPI Beinecke enlargements are not enough, I need at least 700/800 DPI, it is not so difficult
letter saw at microscope matches a voynich letter I found, please watch video for more details
...
And as I have said, ad nauseum, and demonstrated with a picture of a ruler over the folios, the scans we see are higher resolution than what the scribe with the quill pen had to work with.
I think you should try to USE a quill pen on vellum and see how many unique shapes you can fit into half a centimeter. Maybe then you would appreciate how difficult it is to replicate shapes, even ones the full size of a glyph. Trying to replicate subtle shapes 1/8th the size of a glyph or smaller consistently enough that you can recognize them when you see them again could only be done with a microscope, an unusually steady hand, and special drawing tools (not a quill pen).
Whoever penned the VMS was not skilled with a pen and was dealing with a bumpy surface. That is obvious from the slant, the wiggles, and the very uneven flow of the ink. Some of the differences in macro shapes might be meaningful (like the length of a tail), but not 12 individual strokes that make up a letter. I don't believe it.


![[+]](https://www.voynich.ninja/images/collapse_collapsed.png)