BessAgritianin's theory thread

[nablator]

Threads merged, thanks Ruby.

But the thread linked in Tavi's You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view. is You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.

[Oscroft]

Threads merged, thanks Ruby.

But the thread linked in Tavi's You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view. is You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.

Ah, that's an even earlier thread - perhaps graft this merged one onto the end of that one and then rename the whole thing?

[nablator]

So could you provide us with an extract here that provides a detailed translation of a couple of lines, in the form requested by Jorge Stolfi?

In the 4-step method (never fails!) the questionable steps are usually hidden. You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.

[Koen G]

All threads merged, do tell me if you see another part of Bess theory running around somewhere 

[pjburkshire]

It has been reported that the "S" character alone means "with" in Old Czech (Bohemian).  The "S" character appears alone many times in the Voynich Manuscript.  Of course we can't be sure that the EVA "S" was really intended to be "S".  Can you comment on that?

You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.

S - "with"
S přáteli. (With friends.)
S knihou. (With a book.)
S rodinou. (With family.)

[BessAgritianin]

It has been reported that the "S" character alone means "with" in Old Czech (Bohemian).  The "S" character appears alone many times in the Voynich Manuscript.  Of course we can't be sure that the EVA "S" was really intended to be "S".  Can you comment on that?

You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.

S - "with"
S přáteli. (With friends.)
S knihou. (With a book.)
S rodinou. (With family.)

Thank you for your question, In my readings the EVA S is not "s". Remember that EVA transcription is modern and my readings do not agree with its transliteration. 

Also on the other hand I have not read the whole document, nor do I understand everything.

From the narrow translations I have been sure of- the author uses the Instrumental case - these are the endings of the words without "s" in front. For example instead of "s vodou" only "vodou"- by means of water with water
A real example in f2r:  
   
Read as Rucho ijMja  from rucho- bandage is formed  ruchoiMja- with bandage.
And here is another important finding-
 In VM the cases are separated visually- when a reader sees rucho + ijMja
he ponders what is this strange word " ijMja".
The short words that appear frequently in VM are not separate words but grammatical endings. This is why the text resists simple substitution.
I hope that my answer is not censored and reaches you.
I have noticed that some of my answeres have been held for approval.