Dana Scott > 22-09-2026, 01:01 AM
(22-09-2026, 12:01 AM)R. Sale Wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.The devil is in the details. Look, there he goes. Mermaids do not have thighs. The comparison in Post #1 certainly hints at 'sexual viability', which is unusual in itself for mermaids, but clearly, on the other hand, "there don't be no daylight shining through." Medieval mermaids stay as mermaids; AFAIK they don't change to something else. Melusine performed her metamorphosis once a week.
Bonne of Luxembourg was the mother of the Valois lines relevant to the VMs dates. It's not like this information wasn't well known in that era. It's more like certain relevant details have been obscured by the dust devils of history.
JustAnotherTheory > 22-09-2026, 05:25 AM
Rafal > 22-09-2026, 02:20 PM
Quote:Good find. Notice the dots on the animal's body:
DG97EEB > 23-09-2026, 05:15 AM
(21-09-2026, 10:05 PM)Koen G Wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.I had replied that I remembered this being discussed before, but I was unable to find it, and then I started doubting myself and I deleted the post. But I think this is what I may have remembered, JKP referencing one of these MSS in the same context: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.
He also seems to have blogged about it here: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.
I remember back in the day, looking through all possible Buch der Natur MSS for similar plates, with the mermaids and these four, but I found nothing. Only worse ones that are barely parallels, like mermaids with a bunch of fish. I went through everything on Handschriftencensus. Maybe there's more now, so many years later?
Buch Der Natur is probably relevant You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.
Rafal > 23-09-2026, 10:29 AM
Rafal > 23-09-2026, 10:41 AM
Koen G > 23-09-2026, 12:00 PM
DG97EEB > 23-09-2026, 12:25 PM
Rafal > 24-09-2026, 08:49 PM
Rafal > 24-09-2026, 09:14 PM