• Options
• Login
• Desktop Style

Voynich is encrypted ENOCH

• Index

  • The Voynich Ninja
  • Voynich Research
  • Theories & Solutions
  • Voynich is encrypted ENOCH
• Voynich is encrypted ENOCH

• RE: Voynich is encrypted ENOCH

  Antonio García Jiménez > 3 hours ago

  Linking Kircher to the creation of the Voynich manuscript is nonsensical.
  
  That tower has the same shape as others in the Rosettes foldout. What sets it apart is that we cannot see its base because it lies far below, an effect the artist intentionally sought to create. If we look closely beyond the wall, there is a tiny tower at the foot of what appears to be a cliff. We see the walls extending down into the abyss, and buildings clinging in the cliff, stacked one above the other.
  
  I interpret this to mean that the artist is aiming for a "hanging" effect to convey a sense of height—of being in the sky—since the Rosettes represent the universe, and Earth, like the celestial bodies, is suspended in space.

• RE: Voynich is encrypted ENOCH

  R. Sale > 2 hours ago

  I see a patch of yellow paint at the top of the VMs tower. It looks like a flame. Perhaps this represents the Pharos lighthouse.

• RE: Voynich is encrypted ENOCH

  Linda > 1 hour ago

  If you compare to the similar tower with larger yellower roof (above and to the right), you can see it in a way where you do likely see all of the tower, but instead it is the sand dunes or whatever they are, which are disappearing down into the hole, just seen from the front instead of the side. Perhaps fossil dunes? Similar to the one directly above in a similar cutout, except it has no tower on it. Perhaps they are pillars.
  
  Which is interesting to me because I just read something where two islands were called pillars, while reading about fossil sand dunes.

• RE: Voynich is encrypted ENOCH

  Oscroft > 28 minutes ago

  (4 hours ago)Radim Dobeš Wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.My goal was to compare this specific image by Athanasius Kircher with an object in the VMS. I was not looking for other images of the Tower of Babel.

  
  I get that, and I'm sure others do too - and as I and others have suggested before, your searches for images matching VMS ones could definitely be a potentially fruitful avenue of research.
  
  But to determine the likelihood that the VMS tower is Babel, it's surely necessary to compare with other Babel images, don't you think? And in my view, the reasonable match with the Kircher tower doesn't come close to establishing that the VMS tower actually is Babel.
  
  And it's *proof* of absolutely nothing. I suggest you really need to stop thinking of any speculative reasoning based on matching images as "proof". Even after 600 years, there's still zero *proof* of the meaning of any illustrations in the VMS (to the best of my knowledge).
• Next Oldest Next Newest