Rafal > 6 hours ago
5dd95 > 5 hours ago
(6 hours ago)nablator Wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.Hello,
No, this isn’t AI-generated speculation — the research is based on verifiable historical sources.The timeline presented on the website (You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.) outlines how these two figures — separated by centuries — represent distinct layers of annotation:
- Alice Cooke was a real historical figure who lived at Gidea Hall, Romford, Essex, during the early 1600s. Her name and family are documented in estate papers, parish records, and local archival materials. The date “1622” corresponds with her recorded presence at the estate, making her one of the earliest known women connected with the Cooke family holdings.
- John Frederick Lewis (1860–1932) was also a factual, documented figure — a collector and examiner of rare manuscripts, active during the early 20th century. His correspondence and examination notes on the Voynich Manuscript (folios such as 67v) are part of known manuscript-research circles of the time.
Together, these findings build a continuous historical chain connecting Gidea Hall and the Cooke family with later collectors and examiners associated with the Voynich Manuscript’s rediscovery and study.
- Alice Cooke’s early 17th-century estate records, providing a local Essex provenance.
- Lewis’s early 20th-century scholarly notes, linking the manuscript into the modern period of Voynich research.
About:
Quote:- Alice Cooke adds genuine estate birth records in readable English. "1622 Alice At Land"
- Folio You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view. handwriting is modern (1915-1932), not historical.
Quote:Folio 67v Mystery SOLVED — Lewis's Examination NotesYou are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.
Breakthrough: Folio 67v annotations are John Frederick Lewis's examination notes (1915-1932), NOT historical 1620s text!
Multiple Annotation Layers:
- 1620s-1640s: Alice Cooke's Secretary Hand estate records (historical)
- 1915-1932: Lewis's examination notes (modern scholarly)
After reading your website I have no idea where these annotations are visible.
---
Quote:ALICE SIGNS IT: "1622 Alice At Land" — Alice Cooke receives the returned manuscript and immediately signs folio 1r. This is her ownership declaration: "This manuscript is MINE, it's at MY land." Legal documentation of ownership reclaimed.You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.
So you claim that there is a readable text "1622 Alice At Land" somewhere on You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view. that nobody noticed until now. Would you mind pointing out where exactly do you see it on the page?
5dd95 > 5 hours ago
(5 hours ago)5dd95 Wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.(6 hours ago)nablator Wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.Hello,The inscription “1622 Alice At Land” is not visible to the naked eye on the standard high-resolution scans of folio 1r that are publicly available. Its presence was identified through targeted image analysis and decoding methods developed during the research.
No, this isn’t AI-generated speculation — the research is based on verifiable historical sources.The timeline presented on the website (You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.) outlines how these two figures — separated by centuries — represent distinct layers of annotation:
- Alice Cooke was a real historical figure who lived at Gidea Hall, Romford, Essex, during the early 1600s. Her name and family are documented in estate papers, parish records, and local archival materials. The date “1622” corresponds with her recorded presence at the estate, making her one of the earliest known women connected with the Cooke family holdings.
- John Frederick Lewis (1860–1932) was also a factual, documented figure — a collector and examiner of rare manuscripts, active during the early 20th century. His correspondence and examination notes on the Voynich Manuscript (folios such as 67v) are part of known manuscript-research circles of the time.
Together, these findings build a continuous historical chain connecting Gidea Hall and the Cooke family with later collectors and examiners associated with the Voynich Manuscript’s rediscovery and study.
- Alice Cooke’s early 17th-century estate records, providing a local Essex provenance.
- Lewis’s early 20th-century scholarly notes, linking the manuscript into the modern period of Voynich research.
About:
Quote:- Alice Cooke adds genuine estate birth records in readable English. "1622 Alice At Land"
- Folio You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view. handwriting is modern (1915-1932), not historical.
Quote:Folio 67v Mystery SOLVED — Lewis's Examination NotesYou are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.
Breakthrough: Folio 67v annotations are John Frederick Lewis's examination notes (1915-1932), NOT historical 1620s text!
Multiple Annotation Layers:
- 1620s-1640s: Alice Cooke's Secretary Hand estate records (historical)
- 1915-1932: Lewis's examination notes (modern scholarly)
After reading your website I have no idea where these annotations are visible.
---
Quote:ALICE SIGNS IT: "1622 Alice At Land" — Alice Cooke receives the returned manuscript and immediately signs folio 1r. This is her ownership declaration: "This manuscript is MINE, it's at MY land." Legal documentation of ownership reclaimed.You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.
So you claim that there is a readable text "1622 Alice At Land" somewhere on You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view. that nobody noticed until now. Would you mind pointing out where exactly do you see it on the page?
Because this process involves proprietary image-layer separation and interpretive decoding techniques, we’re not disclosing the precise coordinates or method publicly at this time. The goal is to maintain the integrity of the verification process until the data can be independently reviewed.
When the research library and membership portal open on You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view., members will have access to the decoded imagery, methodology notes, and verification materials demonstrating where and how this signature becomes legible.
In short, the text isn’t plainly visible on the scan — it emerges only through the decoding procedure — and full visual evidence will be available for review once the research archive is live.
tavie > 5 hours ago
(5 hours ago)5dd95 Wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.The inscription “1622 Alice At Land” is not visible to the naked eye on the standard high-resolution scans of folio 1r that are publicly available. Its presence was identified through targeted image analysis and decoding methods developed during the research.
5dd95 > 5 hours ago
(5 hours ago)tavie Wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.The inscription “1622 Alice At Land” is not visible to the naked eye on the standard high-resolution scans of folio 1r that are publicly available. Its presence was identified through targeted image analysis and decoding methods developed during the research.(5 hours ago)5dd95 Wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.The inscription “1622 Alice At Land” is not visible to the naked eye on the standard high-resolution scans of folio 1r that are publicly available. Its presence was identified through targeted image analysis and decoding methods developed during the research.
We had another guy on here a while ago claiming he had a secret high tech image analysis technique that allowed him to identify invisible indentations revealing the content of the missing pages.
Spoiler alert: it was all LLM slop.
tavie > 5 hours ago
5dd95 > 5 hours ago
Ruby Novacna > 5 hours ago
(5 hours ago)5dd95 Wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.(5 hours ago)tavie Wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.Copypasting the same text produced by an LLM twice isn't helping your case here.Some People are asking the same Question. I Only Have This Reply.
Koen G > 3 hours ago