nablator > 24-12-2024, 02:58 PM
R. Sale > 24-12-2024, 10:16 PM
nablator > 24-12-2024, 11:35 PM
(24-12-2024, 10:16 PM)R. Sale Wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.I was hoping that the above example dated 1415 would be a stronger candidate. As it is, it's horns are strange. It's flat-footed and pizzleless. Does it have some redeeming qualities?
Koen G > 25-12-2024, 12:19 AM
Koen G > 25-12-2024, 03:10 PM
nablator > 25-12-2024, 06:04 PM
Koen G > 25-12-2024, 06:55 PM
Bernd > 26-12-2024, 09:17 PM
(24-12-2024, 12:37 AM)R. Sale Wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.In the spreadsheet, BNF Latin 9333 is dated 1400. @Bernd dated the ms 1445-1451. [Other thread Post #11]Well I can't date the manuscript myself but I checked several sources and they are confusing: