20-02-2016, 04:51 AM (This post was last modified: 20-02-2016, 04:52 AM by -Job-.)
I see that you deconstruct words using 6 groups. Stolfi used three (core, mantle, crust) in his You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view. for Voynichese. Why the three additional groups?
Also, what criteria do you use to classify codes into each group? Group I is much larger than the others and contains some lengthy codes (e.g. qockhe and checkhe).
Like Stolfi, i would prefer a simpler grammar which is not complete but highlights some of the key patterns in the text.
Nope. I didn't use Professor Stolfi's core, mantle, crust idea. As far as I know, only you and Nick Pelling have thought I did. I do not know why you think this.
I used Professor Stolfi's earlier prefix-midfix-suffix idea with a few more -fixes thrown in. And it is mostly just the idea, not the whole of Professor Stolfi's theory built around that idea.
The only hard and fast criteria I employed was to use what was to be found in the words. I didn't try to put prior constraints on deconstructing the words. Others have and so far seem to be stymied. The 6 groups (one only seldom appearing) reflect what is in the text.
I'm sorry the author of the VMS didn't use a simpler grammar (maybe one with only three elements/code tables?) to accommodate your preferences.
I didn't know Professor Stolfi had written or published any thoughts about the proposed deconstruction process I advocate. So, except for your statement, I don't know what he prefers.
The VMS is what it is, does what it does. I didn't write it.
I'm only showing the proposed pattern, sequence and code tables. They seem to work for 913 out of 918 words, so far - maybe 915 out of 918, if, and when, the other two Group/Table I codes are verified and attributed.
I know there are probably a lot of people that think to themselves that these results can't be right. If they aren't, they do show a whole bunch of coincidences, don't they?
I'm not sure how to ask this nicely, but, in the future on this thread, could we please discuss the pros and cons of the pattern, sequence and codes I have proposed rather than your preferences and expectations or the core, mantle, crust theory of Professor Stolfi. I hope I haven't offended you with this request.
(20-02-2016, 01:05 PM)don of tallahassee wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.Nope. I didn't use Professor Stolfi's core, mantle, crust idea. As far as I know, only you and Nick Pelling have thought I did. I do not know why you think this.
Stolfi has also published a grammar describing Voynichese words, so it's natural to refer to his work when discussing yours. Why do you think that i think that you've based your grammar on Stolfi's ideas? (I don't)
Quote:The only hard and fast criteria I employed was to use what was to be found in the words.
Sure, but why six groups instead of seven for example? Why 'qockhe' in group 1 instead of having only 'qock' in group 1 and 'he' in some other group?
Quote:I'm sorry the author of the VMS didn't use a simpler grammar (maybe one with only three elements/code tables?) to accommodate your preferences.
Asimpler grammar is more informational and has more value. It's not a matter of what i want. I'm sure you realize this or else you would have a 10 group grammar instead.
Quote:I'm only showing the proposed pattern, sequence and code tables. They seem to work for 913 out of 918 words, so far - maybe 915 out of 918, if, and when, the other two Group/Table I codes are verified and attributed.
I'll run some tests to confirm this.
Quote:I'm not sure how to ask this nicely, but, in the future on this thread, could we please discuss the pros and cons of the pattern, sequence and codes I have proposed rather than your preferences and expectations or the core, mantle, crust theory of Professor Stolfi.
I'll continue to post what i find relevant. Maybe you could stop being so patronizing in your replies?
I offer the below list of Voynich words appearing 3 and 4 times in the VMS (from Professor Stolfi's list) for you to run your tests on, if you wish.
I have to show them this way - there seems to be no mechanism on this site for anyone to add attachments except the originator of the thread at the beginning.
I will be deconstructing them (or trying to) over the next week of so. I would be happy to compare my results with yours.
I think there are 541 words on the list. I have combined the words occurring 3 and 4 times into one list, alphabetically.
Not having examined the list in detail or started work, I would like to make a prediction that probably 60% - 65% will deconstruct without added codes. Most of the remaining should deconstruct using additional codes from my site. Second prediction - maybe 70 - 80 more Group/Table I codes and maybe 8 - 10 other codes, the other codes not appearing often, not sure about the Group/Table I codes. I make these predictions based only on the results of the earlier deconstruction lists.
I do have an updated list of codes for Table I (really just the old list with pen and pencil corrections, updates and additions). If you would like to use it, please let me know. I'll email it to you. Most of the other code groups/tables have few, if any, changes that will make a big impact upon the results, I think.
I look forward to comparing results, if you take me up on my challenge. Or you can test the lists I have already presented (the 505 Voynich Lite words and the next 413 words on Professor Stolfi's list) with deconstuctions already in place.
Whatever method of checking my work you decide upon, I would like to see the results, whether they support or refute my findings.
If anyone else would like a try at deconstructing or to check my work, I invite you wholeheartedly.
If run the same program on a similar but different text
and compare the statistical variation on the text as a whole,
and compare the variation on the top (most occur) 10 or 20 words-prefix and the same on the suffix ?
You can see if the VMS text behaves "normal" or where the text/words behaves "the same".
I think such a comparison with ANY other text will show large differences statistically, probably in all areas. But I'm not a statistician.
This is based on my belief that the VMS might be a bunch of recipes for the most part. There may be no normal language word structure or parts of speech or conjugations or tenses in most of the VMS. Or much punctuation, surely none that is evident.
23-02-2016, 01:48 AM (This post was last modified: 23-02-2016, 01:51 AM by don of tallahassee.)
Attached is a preliminary deconstruction of the 541 words repeated 3 or 4 times in the VMS.
It hasn't been checked yet. It may contain errors.
This makes 1459 words I have tried to deconstruct. A few will not deconstruct - about 10. About 10 more do not yet have their Group/Table I codes attributed and verified. The rest deconstruct as I say they should according to my deconstruction ideas and proposed solution.
I'll be finishing these deconstructions in the next couple of days to show all the different groups/tables. I'm sending this out now in case anyone wants to check my work and needs a larger sample.
I don't think I'll need as many additional codes as I thought to do this part, but haven't counted them yet.
If you see anything that doesn't seem right, I wish you'd let me know. If you want to argue about anything, I'm game.
I'm not making this stuff up - the original author did. I'm trying to show what he/she did.
Thank you.
Don of Tallahassee
well, I don't see the attachment, Do you?
I'll add it to the beginning message to this thread.
Attached is a more finalized version of the work done on the 541 words repeated 3 & 4 times in the VMS. 4 words did not deconstruct as expected. Some others do not yet have their Group/Table I codes identified and verified.
24-02-2016, 03:48 PM (This post was last modified: 24-02-2016, 03:53 PM by don of tallahassee.)
Here are the newly rearranged code groups I think were used to construct the VMS words that are repeated 3 or more times in the VMS.
I produced this new list to try to help anyone trying to understand or check my ideas.
The code groups so far found in the 1459 words repeated 3 or more times in the VMS (in accordance with Professor Stolfi's list). The codes in each group have been alphabetized for ease of use. Group I Codes (231 code groups) a, ai, aiin, air, al, alk, ar, aro, cfh, ch, cha, chckh, chckhe, chcph, chcphe, chcth, chcthe, chd, che, checkhe, chee, cheeke, chek, cheke, cheo, cheok, cheol, chep, chet, chete, chey, chk, chke, cho, chockhe, chocthe, chod, choh, chok, choke, chol, cholk, chop, cot, chote, choto, chp, cht, chte, chy, chyk, ctho, ckh, ckhe, ckheo, cph, cphe, cth, cthe, cthee, ctheo, d, da, dai, daii, dair, dal, dch, dche, dchee, dee, do, dsh, dshe, dy, dyk, e, ee, f, fch, fchee, fchol, k, ka, kal, kch, kche, ke, kee, keo, ko, kol, ksh, kshe, l, lch, lche, lchee, lk, lke, lkee, lo, lsh, loee, m, o, och, ockhe, octh, octhe, od, oe, oee, oek, of, ok, okal, okch, oke, okee, okeo, oko, ol, olch, olche, ole, olk, olke, olp, olsh, olte, op, opch, opy, or, os, ot, ota, otal, otch, otche, otchee, ote, otee, oto, otsh, p, pch, pche, po, pot, psh, pshe, q, qo, qockhe, qok, qoke, qokch, qot, qote, qoto, qol, qop, qopch, qoche, qockh, qoe, qolk, qotch, qe, qek, qocthe, qoee, r, rchee, ro, rsh, s, see, sk, so, sol, solk, solke, sh, shckhe, she, shee, sheek,shek, sheke, sheo, sheoke, shep, shk, shke, sho, shok, shoke, shot, t, tch, tchee, tcho, te, tee, teo, to, tol, tsh, y, ych, yche, ychee, yk, yka, ykch, yke, ykee, ykeeo, yl, yp, ypch, ys, ysh, yshe, yshee, yt, ytch, yte, Group II Codes (3 code groups) f, k, t, Group III Codes (10 code groups) a, at, ch, che, co, ee, o, ok, ol, sh, Group IV Codes (7 code groups) a, da, do, e, o, ra, ro, Group V Codes (I think these are various numbers, therefore many of them.)(13 code groups) ckh, cph, cth, d, im, ir, k, l, m, o, p, r, t, Group VI Codes chy, iiin, iin, iir, in, n, s, sy, y, (9 code groups)
Of these groups, there are only four codes repeated in Groups II through VI (so far).
a III, IV k II, V o III, IV, V t II, V
Group II codes are found in very few words.
This effectively means the only Group II through VI codes repeated in most of the words so far deconstructed (in the words repeated 3 or more times in the VMS) are a and o.
Thank you.
Don of Tallahassee
PS-Just for fun. The code o is found in the codes above in Groups I, III, IV and V. At my site, I also show a possible code of o in (Group/)Table II. This means a hypothetical VMS word of ooooo could be deconstructed and understood by using the sequence of deconstruction to tell what's what. Or oooo. Or ooo. Or oo. Or only o. Neat, huh?