Torsten > 24-08-2020, 08:20 PM
(24-08-2020, 07:21 AM)ReneZ Wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.There is a very long thread dedicated to the auto-copy theory, in which I have presented many specific issues with the theory. So have several others. I think that the discussion is best continued there.
Most of the issues have not been properly addressed.
Now, they are classified as 'opinions' and therefore not worthy of a constructive discussion.
I would then say that opinions of people who like the auto-copy theory should also be discarded, because these are quite obviously only opinions.
Stephen Carlson > 25-08-2020, 01:05 AM
(24-08-2020, 07:09 PM)Torsten Wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.(24-08-2020, 04:47 PM)Stephen Carlson Wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.Is there a test that can distinguish meaningless and undecipherable? And if there isn't, what does that mean for us?
No, such a test doesn't exists. It is possible to use a meaningful text as cover text for secret message and it is also possible to use a text which itself is meaningless for the same purpose. There are only tests for estimating the amount of information a given unreadable text can carry.