davidjackson > 19-09-2019, 10:03 PM
Torsten > 19-09-2019, 10:42 PM
Torsten > 21-10-2019, 10:57 PM
(29-08-2019, 05:50 PM)Helmut Winkler Wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.The autocopying theory is a very good example for what i call ahistorical, like the hoax or the fake theory. It has nothing to do with a 15th c. ms., it is a concept of the 21st c. projected onto the 15th c.
(20-10-2019, 05:51 PM)Helmut Winkler Wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.To come back to T.T. and his theory J. Hermes: Like many other theories, Talbot, Tucker, Rugg, andd so on it is simply ahistorical, it ignores the simple, undisputable fact that we have in B. 408 a document of the first half of the 15th c. and it projects 20th c. concepts into the Late Middle Ages.
Monica Yokubinas > 21-10-2019, 11:23 PM
ReneZ > 22-10-2019, 06:23 AM
Quote:I didn't write that (but I apologize if I expressed it misleadingly). What I wrote was that A) I'm still surprised that the autocopist theory has received relatively little attention (with Cheshire / Gibbs etc. in mind). Also I wrote that B) I still cannot find any real arguments in the relevant forums to suggest that an alternative theory would be preferable to that of the autocopist. Witch doesn't mean it wasn't discussed. But I'm glad I gave you an impulse to re-read the papers ;-)
Helmut Winkler > 22-10-2019, 08:02 AM
Torsten > 22-10-2019, 10:38 AM
(22-10-2019, 08:02 AM)Helmut Winkler Wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.To which concept of the 21st century do you refer?
ReneZ > 23-10-2019, 05:29 AM
Wladimir D > 23-10-2019, 09:00 AM
nablator > 23-10-2019, 10:47 AM