I understand Helmut Winkler well what he means.
So the loop could also be interpreted as an old 4.
In exactly the same way, a 2 and a 5 are possible.
On the subject of proof. I can understand that one could interpret the plants and the signs of the zodiac as astronomical signs.
But we still have Quire 13 (pharmaceutical part).
To draw a reasonable background with your theory on these pages is not only difficult but simply impossible.
There is the possibility to understand something even if you cannot read the text. The sequence of images alone makes sense.
But the fact that we always have similar sequences of signs on all pages, which we regard as words, makes the theory appear to be a pure interpretation without a scientific background.
It simply takes more than a 4 and an 8.
Translated with You are not allowed to view links.
Register or
Login to view. (free version)