nickpelling > 17-08-2017, 05:58 PM
(17-08-2017, 05:32 PM)Koen Gh. Wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.I'm sure others think discussing the ideas of Nick Pelling is a waste of time. I don't see much difference really, since nobody has much to show at this point.
Anton > 17-08-2017, 06:56 PM
-JKP- > 17-08-2017, 07:00 PM
(17-08-2017, 05:58 PM)nickpelling Wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.(17-08-2017, 05:32 PM)Koen Gh. Wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.I'm sure others think discussing the ideas of Nick Pelling is a waste of time. I don't see much difference really, since nobody has much to show at this point.
Good luck finding people to discuss your own ideas.
Koen G > 17-08-2017, 07:03 PM
Torsten > 17-08-2017, 07:12 PM
(17-08-2017, 03:42 PM)nickpelling Wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.Discussing the ideas of others has largely proved to be a waste of my time, but feel free to spend your time how you like. :-)
Ruby Novacna > 17-08-2017, 08:10 PM
ReneZ > 17-08-2017, 08:20 PM
(17-08-2017, 07:03 PM)Koen Gh. Wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.I think there's been a very theory-driven era in Voynich research, and the forum is slowly starting to break that down into the discussion of individual arguments, ideas, proposals... independent of who brings them forward.
-JKP- > 17-08-2017, 10:36 PM
davidjackson > 17-08-2017, 10:46 PM
Emma May Smith > 18-08-2017, 09:54 AM
(17-08-2017, 10:36 PM)-JKP- Wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.The "tone" of the research is bound to change over time.
The more researchers who have contributed in the past, the more difficult it becomes to find new or original lines of inquiry. The early researchers had an open field—anything they said about it was new.
We have to work harder and with more imagination to add anything of significance to what already exists.